NASA – Net Allocation Sorely Abused

When I woke up this morning and saw that this mess was on the top 3 for today’s headlines in science I just had to chime in. This is ridiculous. Then again, maybe it isn’t when you consider all the facts. Last night astronauts filmed a “trick video” using a fidget spinner on the ISS.

With that said, let’s take a look at the facts. I can’t help but wonder how much it cost to get that fidget spinner up there in the first place. Not to mention the fact that it is a “custom” fidget spinner (so, there was already some money spent there). Depending on what method was used, the cost per pound for NASA to send anything to the International Space Station is pretty ridiculous. It can cost anywhere from $2,000 per pound or as high as $13,000 per pound. Needless to say, getting cargo to the crew is expensive.

From what I could find on the web, the average “custom” fidget spinner weighs about 70 grams. So, let’s do the math.

spinnercost

If you think I am making those numbers up, then here is a 2016 Business Insider article that covers some of those allocated costs for any given trip to the ISS. The cost for sending things into space is preposterous.

Setting all of this aside, let’s be generous here and give good ol’ NASA the benefit of the doubt. Let’s assume that since the fidget spinner is custom, it cost $20 while also going with the lowest possible cargo cost. Up front, this little “trick video” cost $350 right out of the gate (and again, that is being generous).

Part of me wants to get aggravated at this, but then again… we need to review all of the facts, remember?

So… with that, I can’t help but ask what the purpose of a fidget spinner might be. This Live Science article from August of 2017 hit the nail right on the head. Here is a quote from that article.

There’s no doubt that toys that allow kids to fidget can benefit kids with autism. Occupational therapists often use sensory toys like tactile discs, Koosh balls and even putties or clays to soothe kids who have sensory-processing issues. Similarly, research has shown that movement can help kids with ADHD to focus. 

Maybe the title of my post is wrong. Maybe, just maybe… it was money well spent after all. Because let’s face it, you never actually see any real science taking place on the ISS. It’s always just them doing flips, spinning their microphone, or flying. Maybe NASA sent that fidget spinner for a reason (to help these kids focus and get back on task).

But seriously though, space is fake and it doesn’t cost a dime to send anything up there. All of those cargo costs is just one way for the government to funnel massive lumps of money.

Because, at the end of it all this isn’t about 350 dollars. It is about 1.5 billion dollars per cargo shipment (which includes every time we send man as part of that cargo shipment).

But, who are we kidding… I am ignorant. Don’t listen to me.

Advertisements

SpaceX: more like FakeX

I’m sorry, but SpaceX is a joke.

Yesterday evening and into the night they launched yet again another SAT into geostationary orbit. Good for them. I have watched every single launch. And when I have had the opportunity I have watched them live. And sadly, I am surprised to see that more people are not realizing that it is all a bunch of nonsense. This company is using sleight of hand to trick people into thinking they are doing something they are not. Every single launch they have done shows the exact same type of footage to the letter. When the reusable capsule rocket ascends for landing the camera goes out (either in total or just long enough to disrupt the landing sequence). When the SAT is released and opens up it is only shown for a split second with an excited crowd cheering in the audio background noise. The shot is just long enough that you don’t see anything at all.

It is all a joke.

And if you think I am just full of it, look at the following launch images from SpaceX and ask yourself, do you honestly see these images and think to yourself that these rockets left the atmosphere?

spacex.png

I think not. They launch up, reach roughly 20 miles high and then careen downward (not up and away, but rather; around and down). If you look at those shots and can honestly tell yourself that these rockets reached beyond the exosphere then you are in denial. That arch is literally taking place in the stratosphere, people.

And all I can say to that is this;

2 Peter 3:2-7That ye may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour: Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

But, don’t take my word for it. Just ask good ol’ Bill what he thinks.

bill.png

The earth goes missing on a spacewalk

nasa.png

Just wanted to pose one quick little question. What happened to the earth in the sequence of shots taken from 3, 4, and 5 from the second camera angel in the following video?

The earth just vanished.

Not to mention the fact that you can tell that the astronaut is in front of a transparency during the movement he makes in the second camera shot. And also, why is it that during the sequence taking place from shots 3 though 5 we see a pulsating affect happening as the object crosses the path of total darkness?

And if your answer to this question is that it is simply the camera angel, then why is it that the shots taken from the second camera don’t appear to reveal earth shine against the ISS? For those of you that aren’t in the know, earth shine is the glow caused by sunlight reflected off the earth.

Anyway, I am probably just being silly… or then again, probably not.

Why live practical when you can dream big instead?

So, Elon Musk is making some big proposals as seen in the above video. Rather than point out the simple fact that none of this was actual footage, but instead mere CGI nonsense… I want to make a proposal of my own.

Rather than insist that you can accomplish such a lofty dream within the next 6 years, why not prove that you can by demonstrating your capabilities somewhere closer to home? Show me that this lofty dream about Mars is truly possible by accomplishing it on the moon first. The funny thing is, they won’t.

Because, they can’t.

Elon Musk and SpaceX have yet to prove they can do something small. So, why then is the world drooling in awe at their lofty dreams? Build a moon base and prove that is it possible to sustain life outside of earth… and then we will talk.

But instead of proving it to be possible we will just skip that part and believe on blind faith that it is possible simply because a man who claims to be wise told us so.

Give me a break, people. Nothing that SpaceX has produces is real. I have yet to watch a single launch/landing that didn’t cut to CGI or change camera just at the right moment resulting in absolutely zero uninterrupted shots of a successful landing.

Things like that are generally called misdirection in the world of magic.

And that’s all this is… magical hopes provides by magical people that do nothing true in the real world.

If this junk is possible, prove it first by doing something more realistic like a base on the moon. Why on earth would we skip such a step unless this is nothing more than lofty misdirection in the first place?

Lastly, I would like to point out that SpaceX is claiming that they will accomplish this first phases of this task within the next 6 years. I do not at all find this to be coincidental when you consider the current signs of the times. If you don’t know what I am talking about, then go read the last post I did about the stars.

Those that are in control of the delusion are running out of time and they realize that…. which is why the claims are becoming big and bolder with tighter deadlines.

Rant over. Space is fake.

Climate change… yeah, that’s it.

Revelation 9:3And there came out of the smoke locusts upon the earth: and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power.

August 31st –  Trinidad

September 9th – Russia

September 12th – Dagestan

September 11th – China

Although I have personal reason to believe that the Revelation 9 reference to locusts is actually a result of the bottomless pit being opened during the tribulation period, I will say this. When you look at all that is currently happening (earthquakes in diverse places, devastating whirlwinds, one third of North America currently on fire, floods, and more…), I can’t help but see this type of thing as a precursor to what is to come shortly.

But, who are we kidding, right? I am ignorant. It’s all probably just climate change.

Asteroid 2012 TC4 to Safely Pass Earth This October

I find it pretty funny that only 3 weeks after the biblically foretold great wonder in heaven, NASA will be testing out its first CNEOS run ever on a passing asteroid. Seems pretty coincidental to me. I can’t wait to hear all about what they find.

One thing that I have noticed about the progression of science as of late is that it has been speedily ramping into facts based on theory at an alarming rate. Things like dark matter, string theory, and others have rapidly become fact over night with no real evidence to show. One prime example of this type of evidence is the fact that NASA intentionally sent its Cassini space craft into the planet rather than one of the moons, because they didn’t want to potentially kill any living creatures there.

Give me a freaking break. It’s all nothing more than a bunch of cartoons. And proof of that is this right here.

asteroid-earth-animation.gif

Look at that beautiful CGI nonsense. The thing that I find comical is the fact that it isn’t going to change. After October comes and goes and NASA releases the data from the CNEOS testing… it’s going to be the same cartoon nonsense. And everyone is going to eat it up as proof of extra terrestrial life.

It’s a cartoon people!

If you actually step back and look at the overall flow of recent NASA content, they sure have been pushing the distant life agenda a lot in the last two months. I personally don’t think that is a coincidence at all.

But who are we kidding… my tinfoil hat is clearly affecting my brain.

You people need to wake up. Nothing that NASA shows us is “actual” footage. They will never be able to show us “actual” footage, because space is freaking fake.

It is nothing more than a smokescreen of delusion created to explain away any need for a creator.