NASA – Not Always Scientifically Accurate

Geostationaryjava3D (1)Satellite Internet access is Internet access provided through communications satellites. Modern consumer grade satellite Internet service is typically provided to individual users through geostationary satellites that can offer relatively high data speeds, with newer satellites using K-band to achieve downstream data speeds up to 50 Mbps. A geostationary orbit, geostationary Earth orbit or geosynchronous equatorial orbit (GEO) is a circular orbit 35,786 kilometres (22,236 miles) above the Earth’s equator and following the direction of the Earth’s rotation. An object in such an orbit has an orbital period equal to the Earth’s rotational period (one sidereal day) and thus appears motionless, at a fixed position in the sky, to ground observers.

tumblr_nfr45rZatj1rnq3cto1_500

A Van Allen radiation belt is a zone of energetic charged particles, most of which originate from the solar wind that is captured by and held around a planet by that planet’s magnetic field. The Earth has two such belts and sometimes others may be temporarily created. The discovery of the belts is credited to James Van Allen, and as a result the Earth’s belts are known as the Van Allen belts. Earth’s two main belts extend from an altitude of about 500 to 58,000 kilometers (300 to 36,000 miles) above the surface in which region radiation levels vary. Most of the particles that form the belts are thought to come from solar wind and other particles by cosmic rays. By trapping the solar wind, the magnetic field deflects those energetic particles and protects the Earth’s atmosphere from destruction.

Quote from the Above Video: “Radiation like this could harm the guidance systems, on-board computers, or other electronics on Orion“.

Now, with that in mind… here we are at the end of 2017 and the Orion capsule has still not been sent up to take its readings while also testing to see what affects the radiation will have on the electronics of the craft. With that, Syncom 2 was the first geosynchronous communications satellite. The satellite was launched by NASA on July 26, 1963 with the Delta B #20 launch vehicle from Cape Canaveral.

Here is my questionHow are we to believe that there are thirty so called geosynchronous communications satellites currently in deep orbit parked right smack dab in the middle of the Van Allen Radiation Belt, and still… in 2017 we have no readings on the affects of this radiation on guidance systems or the computers and electronic components of a man made object?

This makes absolutely no sense.

We have supposedly had man made computer based guidance system electronics in geosynchronous orbit for almost 55 years, and here we have NASA admitting they still don’t know what to expect? Those geosynchronous communications satellites have essentially been parked up there in the thick of that radiation for more than 5 decades and NASA is just now deciding to send up Orion in 2018 to take readings that we clearly should already have.

Hhmmmm…

Seems legit.

Advertisements

SpaceX to the rescue!!!

Yesterday SpaceX launched a Russian Cargo craft which plans to dock with the ISS within two days after launch. The Progress carried almost three tons of food, fuel and supplies for the Expedition 53 crew on the station. The spacecraft is scheduled to make a quick, two-orbit journey to the station.

Now, I’m no expert… but seriously, if anyone watches this video and still thinks it is real… wow, just wow.

But, for those of you that don’t feel the need to watch a 10 minute video of the most recent SpaceX launch, here are some quick little screen captured snippets from that video. It’s pretty much the most majestic thing I have ever seen.

unnamed

Let’s totally disregard the fact that the live footage clearly shows the rocket only reaching an altitude of about 20 miles maximum before changing its trajectory from an upward assent to a horizontal then downward one before the feed changes to that pure gold CGI.

Wow… I am literally at a loss for words here. This has got to be the most realistic thing I have ever seen (of course only if it’s 1998 and you are playing a PlayStation One, of course).

ganes

How in the mess is anyone buying this junk? SpaceX needs to hire some of the guys that have done more recent work for things like the PS4.

I think it might be a good move… just saying.

NASA – Net Allocation Sorely Abused

When I woke up this morning and saw that this mess was on the top 3 for today’s headlines in science I just had to chime in. This is ridiculous. Then again, maybe it isn’t when you consider all the facts. Last night astronauts filmed a “trick video” using a fidget spinner on the ISS.

With that said, let’s take a look at the facts. I can’t help but wonder how much it cost to get that fidget spinner up there in the first place. Not to mention the fact that it is a “custom” fidget spinner (so, there was already some money spent there). Depending on what method was used, the cost per pound for NASA to send anything to the International Space Station is pretty ridiculous. It can cost anywhere from $2,000 per pound or as high as $13,000 per pound. Needless to say, getting cargo to the crew is expensive.

From what I could find on the web, the average “custom” fidget spinner weighs about 70 grams. So, let’s do the math.

spinnercost

If you think I am making those numbers up, then here is a 2016 Business Insider article that covers some of those allocated costs for any given trip to the ISS. The cost for sending things into space is preposterous.

Setting all of this aside, let’s be generous here and give good ol’ NASA the benefit of the doubt. Let’s assume that since the fidget spinner is custom, it cost $20 while also going with the lowest possible cargo cost. Up front, this little “trick video” cost $350 right out of the gate (and again, that is being generous).

Part of me wants to get aggravated at this, but then again… we need to review all of the facts, remember?

So… with that, I can’t help but ask what the purpose of a fidget spinner might be. This Live Science article from August of 2017 hit the nail right on the head. Here is a quote from that article.

There’s no doubt that toys that allow kids to fidget can benefit kids with autism. Occupational therapists often use sensory toys like tactile discs, Koosh balls and even putties or clays to soothe kids who have sensory-processing issues. Similarly, research has shown that movement can help kids with ADHD to focus. 

Maybe the title of my post is wrong. Maybe, just maybe… it was money well spent after all. Because let’s face it, you never actually see any real science taking place on the ISS. It’s always just them doing flips, spinning their microphone, or flying. Maybe NASA sent that fidget spinner for a reason (to help these kids focus and get back on task).

But seriously though, space is fake and it doesn’t cost a dime to send anything up there. All of those cargo costs is just one way for the government to funnel massive lumps of money.

Because, at the end of it all this isn’t about 350 dollars. It is about 1.5 billion dollars per cargo shipment (which includes every time we send man as part of that cargo shipment).

But, who are we kidding… I am ignorant. Don’t listen to me.

Why live practical when you can dream big instead?

So, Elon Musk is making some big proposals as seen in the above video. Rather than point out the simple fact that none of this was actual footage, but instead mere CGI nonsense… I want to make a proposal of my own.

Rather than insist that you can accomplish such a lofty dream within the next 6 years, why not prove that you can by demonstrating your capabilities somewhere closer to home? Show me that this lofty dream about Mars is truly possible by accomplishing it on the moon first. The funny thing is, they won’t.

Because, they can’t.

Elon Musk and SpaceX have yet to prove they can do something small. So, why then is the world drooling in awe at their lofty dreams? Build a moon base and prove that is it possible to sustain life outside of earth… and then we will talk.

But instead of proving it to be possible we will just skip that part and believe on blind faith that it is possible simply because a man who claims to be wise told us so.

Give me a break, people. Nothing that SpaceX has produces is real. I have yet to watch a single launch/landing that didn’t cut to CGI or change camera just at the right moment resulting in absolutely zero uninterrupted shots of a successful landing.

Things like that are generally called misdirection in the world of magic.

And that’s all this is… magical hopes provides by magical people that do nothing true in the real world.

If this junk is possible, prove it first by doing something more realistic like a base on the moon. Why on earth would we skip such a step unless this is nothing more than lofty misdirection in the first place?

Lastly, I would like to point out that SpaceX is claiming that they will accomplish this first phases of this task within the next 6 years. I do not at all find this to be coincidental when you consider the current signs of the times. If you don’t know what I am talking about, then go read the last post I did about the stars.

Those that are in control of the delusion are running out of time and they realize that…. which is why the claims are becoming big and bolder with tighter deadlines.

Rant over. Space is fake.

New in the realm of Fake Space Exploration

So, I decided to take a quick look at what new topics are being ramped up in the space community today just for the heck of it. And as always there is a lot going on. Something new is always being invented, proposed, or funded.

Just for starters, we have the Hubble spotting a comet. Then there is the unveiling of a Mars Space Station. Not to mention the proposal for a Pluto booster Lander. I think my favorite one however has to be the idea that Russia and America plan to build a station in orbit around the moon.

Hubble Spots Farthest-Ever Incoming Active Comet (This is a drawing)

commet.png

Lockheed Martin unveils Mars space station and surface Lander (This is a drawing)

yep.png

Space visionaries boost Pluto lander (This is a drawing)

pluto-lander-illustration-e1506590690537

NASA teams up with Russia for new station near the moon. (This is a drawing)

moon.png

I find it funny how so many of us take the time to defend the idea of space exploration as if it were some truly real thing that could ever actually be possible. Space is fake and the only thing you need to do to realize this truth is to open your eyes and take an honest look. The only thing that is ever put in front of the public regarding space exploration is mere cartoons, drawings, photoshop renderings, CGI, and speculative imagination. That is all it has ever been and that is all it will ever be. The date for pressing beyond the exosphere with a manned mission continues to get pushed back. And it will always get pushed back, because at the end of the day the billions of trillions of dollars spent on these types of programs only ends up producing imagination and illustration.

But don’t take my tinfoil hat wearing word for it. Just take an honest unbiased step back and genuinely look at what you are being presented. You are being spoon fed cartoons. That is all the space community ever presents. And it is all they will ever continue to present.

The farthest man has ever gone is 400 miles up. And even at that height the radiation levels are so high that it is a health risk to travel to that altitude.

But who are we kidding right? I clearly am the one who is ignorant here… And not the millions of people around the world who chose to continue to believe that one day this endless stream of CGI and photoshop illustration nonsense will become a reality.

The funny thing is, this list actually could go on and on, but I chose to just show a few examples. You should take the time to go look at Elon Musk’s city to city travel proposal. It is hilarious nonsensical CGI and everyone is buying it.

Space is fake.

 

Asteroid 2012 TC4 to Safely Pass Earth This October

I find it pretty funny that only 3 weeks after the biblically foretold great wonder in heaven, NASA will be testing out its first CNEOS run ever on a passing asteroid. Seems pretty coincidental to me. I can’t wait to hear all about what they find.

One thing that I have noticed about the progression of science as of late is that it has been speedily ramping into facts based on theory at an alarming rate. Things like dark matter, string theory, and others have rapidly become fact over night with no real evidence to show. One prime example of this type of evidence is the fact that NASA intentionally sent its Cassini space craft into the planet rather than one of the moons, because they didn’t want to potentially kill any living creatures there.

Give me a freaking break. It’s all nothing more than a bunch of cartoons. And proof of that is this right here.

asteroid-earth-animation.gif

Look at that beautiful CGI nonsense. The thing that I find comical is the fact that it isn’t going to change. After October comes and goes and NASA releases the data from the CNEOS testing… it’s going to be the same cartoon nonsense. And everyone is going to eat it up as proof of extra terrestrial life.

It’s a cartoon people!

If you actually step back and look at the overall flow of recent NASA content, they sure have been pushing the distant life agenda a lot in the last two months. I personally don’t think that is a coincidence at all.

But who are we kidding… my tinfoil hat is clearly affecting my brain.

You people need to wake up. Nothing that NASA shows us is “actual” footage. They will never be able to show us “actual” footage, because space is freaking fake.

It is nothing more than a smokescreen of delusion created to explain away any need for a creator.

How high do we have to go to see the curve?

Job 38:1-5 – Then the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said, Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge? Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me. Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it?

howhigh