Look Ma’, No hands!!!

22fsm0.gif

BrownRedDipper.gif

tumblr_inline_o19p7nFIfT1tzhl5u_500.gif

Advertisements

Astronaut apologizing over “Fake News”?

In the following article, Astronaut apologizes for ‘fake news’ claim he grew 3½ inches in space, one new ISS astronaut is under the spotlight over some silly accusations. Personally, I find the timing comical when you consider what happened literally just a few days prior.

DSzxL_AX0AE8oXn

Instead of explaining away a false accusation generated by its own media outlets… why don’t we address the actual false claim that glitched out live during an interview in which the green screen behind the astronauts was revealed after the layering mask was shut off suddenly at the very end of the interview. The ironic aspect to the glitch is that only the objects appearing to be in a form of suspended free floating space were affected by the glitch. This would include the astronauts and that big grey weight lifting thing on the right of course. But, notice the pouch on the bottom left of the shot. Only the object and not the wall as a whole was affected.

Why is it that major aspects of the foreground were affected while the background was not?

Go watch it for yourself.

fake.png

Hhmm… Seems legit to me, people. Seems legit.

But, rather than buying into the “Fake News” nonsense I would simply suggest that timing is everything. And those that have bought into the #fakenews hashtag need to wake up and realize that they are feeding into exactly what is pouring right out of the media’s hands with intention.

2 Timothy 4:4 – And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

Hey, but what do I know. I clearly am just ignorant.

Space is fake.

OSIRIS-REx camera and a gorgeous photo

First off, the article is titled OSIRIS-REx tested its cameras by taking a gorgeous photo of its home planet. So, the craft took a photograph… I think. Or wait, an “image“. Which is it? The powers that be either took a photo or it is what NASA and its sister companies love to call “a composite“.

Acording to the article, OSIRIS-REx launched in September 2016, using Earth as a slingshot the following year for help redirecting its path to Bennu. During the maneuver, it turned its mid-range scientific camera MapCam towards the Earth, snapping some pics of our planet in space.

osiris-1

But, rather than point out the obvious fact that the above photos are in all actuality, not photos at all, I want to address something else that I have addressed in the past. But first, I find it ironic that both NASA, its sister companies, and those who post on their content are double tongued. Either these “images” are actual photos or they aren’t. It’s that simple.

The above image is a composite of photographs captured on October 2, 2017. The images were taken using three color filters, then the contrast on the moon was stretched to make it brighter and more visible. 

In short, we are told “photograph” while they simultaneously imply tampering to a large degree. By adjusting the exposure on the “photo“, you can see the light directive given to the earthen object. This is unnatural as we all know that light bends toward the observer in some cases as well as spreading outward the longer the distace (in this case we are led to believe the observer is a man made object 3,180,000 miles from home with the ability to be controlled and manipulated wireless from that great of a distance with nothing but the empty vacuum of space as its medium for transiting a signal).

One, why doesn’t the light bend toward the camera? Two, if it is multiple images overlaying one another, how are the clouds on earth from that great of a distance so clearly defined? Three, what in the world are the variations of black-static-grey strips if not a tacky slack photoshop job?

stufftoblowyourmind-23-2015-08-osirisisis-feature

Now, with all of that aside I want to point out the real reason why I wanted to address this subject specifically. OSIRIS-Rex means – Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, and Security-Regolith Explorer. In short, I find it funny that the first word is “origins” explorer.

With that, we are going to leave it to NASA (Hebrew meaning – deceiver) with finding our origins with the help of Osiris as he flies through space to reach Bennu, the bird.

Osiris is the Egyptian Lord of the Underworld and Judge of the Dead, brother-husband to Isis, and one of the most important gods of ancient Egypt. The name `Osiris‘ is the Latinized form of the Egyptian Usir which is interpreted as ‘powerful’ or ‘mighty‘.

Bennu on the other hand was a self-created being said to have played a role in the creation of the world. It was said to be the ba of Ra and enabled the creative actions of Atum. It was said to have flown over the waters of Nun that existed before creation, landing on a rock and issuing a call that determined the nature of creation.

bennu2

But hey… science is clearly unbiased when it comes to religious or spiritual connotations… right?

Genesis 1: 1-2In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

Don’t be fooled. Space isn’t a series of photos. It is a series of artists using programs like photoshop to push their agenda (and in this case it happens to be that of Pagan worship).

2 Timothy 4:4And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

If you want to believe in their nonsensical photoshop and the promotion of Pegan gods, you go right ahead.

Space is fake.

NASA and the Conceptual Artist LAB

First things first, I came across this CNET article that suggests that the world’s oldest fossils are something like 3.5 million years old. And of course they take it a step further by tying in NASA and aliens, and bla… bla… bla…

nasalab.png

The thing that I took away from that article, however, is the fact that NASA owns up to the fact that part of their budget goes to a “Conceptual Art Lab”. NASA literally has a team that gets paid to draw cartoons.

Hhhmmmm…

So, of course I looked up the lab (linked twice above), and what else can you expect other than dinky little kids art like the following.

face.png

If you don’t understand where I am going with this, then I feel sorry for you.

Space is fake and all the “images” we are shown either of or from deep space are all fake, cartoon “Conceptual Art“. And if you don’t believe me, feel free to hunt down some planetary texturing layers online (some of which I have personally traced back to NASA as supposed photos from the Hubble).

What a Joke.

The only way I know best to close out this post is with the following bit of scripture.

Matthew 24:24 – For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

Riddle me this; 10 Simple questions for any NASA fan

Here is the video from two days ago when three new astronauts apparently went up into the atmosphere and connected with the ISS. After you have watched it, I want to pose a few questions.

One: What in the world happens with the video feed at the 55 second mark? It seemed to skip.

Two: Why does the smoke trail at only 1:25 minutes in actually show the rocked coming back down?

Three: At 1:50 minutes, the announcer suggests that it is only an 8 minute climb into orbit. In order to obtain an orbit we are allegedly supposed to be in the thermosphere at least. That is basically to say that within 8 minutes you will have traveled a total of 250+ miles. You would literally have to be traveling at a speed of 1,500 miles an hour to make it a total of 250 miles in 10 minutes, let alone 8. Please tell me what human being can withstand that level of G-Force and live?

Four: At 2 minutes in, the rocket is literally coming back down. It is literally returning. It went up, arched, and is now facing the opposing direction. Please explain to me how that works?

Five: This dude at 2:51 minutes in literally just said that the rocket is traveling at more than 3,300 miles per hour. You know… because, you wouldn’t black out or anything. How outrageous do they honestly have to be? (my favorite part of this statement is the fact that the very next shot is from inside the rocket, showing a still conscious group of people). You know, because that’s real.

Six: At 3:45 minutes in they are traveling at more than 4,700 miles per hour. They are literally still inside the atmosphere, traveling at more than 1.3 miles per second and have the audacity to wave and smile at the camera? I am pretty sure I would be pinned to my seat.

Seven: With number six in mind, what type of camera mount are they using? With that type of G-Force and speed, wouldn’t the camera be rattling so hard it would be tough making out the occupants inside the rocket?

Eight: at 4 minutes in the crew knows that they are being talked about. You can tell, because they start pretending to be busy. Reading some notes… using a stick to press buttons on a control panel. First off, the rocket is remotely controlled… and second, if I can get motion sickness from reading while riding in a car going 70 miles an hour… please explain his lack of a migraine while reading at 4,000+ miles an hour? At this stage the rocket is still in the atmosphere. It would be rattling like madness (just going to read a paper, like a boss. No big deal).

Nine: The guy literally got done pressing buttons as soon as the scene was over. He knew that the scene was cutting. Right as they are cutting the scene they are done pretending to do things.

Ten: They literally cut the shot to a cartoon at just over 4 minutes in. A freaking cartoon, people. It… Is… FAKE!!!

With all 10 of these comments “now posed” regarding the most recent docking to the ISS carrying a human payload, by all means, please rationally and logically explain away each one.

I’m waiting…

Oh no… running out of NASA kryptonite?

Plutonium238 is a radioactive isotope of plutonium that has a half-life of 87.7 years. Plutonium238 is a very powerful alpha emitter. This makes the plutonium238 isotope suitable for usage in radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) and radioisotope heater units. The density of plutonium238 is 19.329 g/cm³.

Plutonium 238

And according to this space article over on the Sunday Express, we are running out of this epic material. NASA and all of her sister companies need this epic space-kryptonite in order to travel space, or whatever.

Oh me, oh my… What ever shall we do?

No more plutonium-238, no more space illustrations. As a matter of fact, if we illustrate one fast enough, I bet we could find an exo-planet within our reach that is made of this stuff!

What do you think?

Planet-892898

Thank God for NASA illustrators. I wasn’t sure what were going to do.

Earth waves? More like fake images!!!

This Washington Post article talking about the alleged hum of the earth had my interest. Before I even took the time to actually read the article (something I still have not done), the NASA/Getty Image grabbed my attention even more. With that, I dropped the alleged image into photoshop and adjusted the opacity.

Untitled-1

And what do you know…

It isn’t an actual photo, as to be expected. It is a composite (or in other words, a drawing). With that, I decided to take a look at what exactly a “Getty Image” actually is.

It is basically a shutterstock company. Well, what do you know… good ol’ NASA partnering with an stock image provider to produce images of the earth rather than showing us a real image taken from an alleged real geostationary satellite.

How incompetent do you really have to be to still be buying anything any of these space agencies claim?

All they ever produce are artist illustrations. And in this case, NASA isn’t even the one that produced it. They hired a stock image website to do it for them.

Space is fake.