Latest from the imaginations of space

5.png

The only limit to human future is our own imaginations.” – Don Pettit

Now, I realize that I have used the above little quote from Don Pettit a few times when writing blog posts about space. But, I just find it too ironic to not come back to time and time again. Above, we have Don, in reference to space exploration, explaining that the only limitations is our imagination. He doesn’t say “willpower“, or “intelligence“, or “ambition to succeed“, or “technological achievements“. No, he chose to use the word “imagination“.

The only thing keeping us from reaching further into space is our imagination. It is our “imagination” that can take us “anywhere“!

With that said… let’s take a moment to review the Jet Propulsion Laboratory of NASA for their latest news from space.

1
This is an illustration.
2
All of these are also illustrations.
3
All of these are also illustration in case you didn’t notice.
4
Would you look at that… more artist illustrations.

Just for the sake of assuming there are some of you that may not understand where I am going with this post, I will spell it out for you. Every single article for the last two months posted under the JPL of NASA are supported by the “imaginations” of an artist illustrator. If you go take a look for yourself, you will more than likely find that only 1 in 10 articles on that website are data driver rather than imagination driven. And even then, if 9 out of 10 are fake… who is to say that the data isn’t also fake?

But hey, don’t take my word for it. I am clearly just an ignorant blogger and nothing more. Popular Science Magazine on the other hand… they might know what they’re talking about. These guys admit that the best jobs in science belong to the people that get paid to have an imagination by turning raw data into art.

That is all that space is, people… an artist’s imagination. And people like Don Pettit know this.

Space is fake.

Advertisements

New in the realm of Fake Space Exploration

So, I decided to take a quick look at what new topics are being ramped up in the space community today just for the heck of it. And as always there is a lot going on. Something new is always being invented, proposed, or funded.

Just for starters, we have the Hubble spotting a comet. Then there is the unveiling of a Mars Space Station. Not to mention the proposal for a Pluto booster Lander. I think my favorite one however has to be the idea that Russia and America plan to build a station in orbit around the moon.

Hubble Spots Farthest-Ever Incoming Active Comet (This is a drawing)

commet.png

Lockheed Martin unveils Mars space station and surface Lander (This is a drawing)

yep.png

Space visionaries boost Pluto lander (This is a drawing)

pluto-lander-illustration-e1506590690537

NASA teams up with Russia for new station near the moon. (This is a drawing)

moon.png

I find it funny how so many of us take the time to defend the idea of space exploration as if it were some truly real thing that could ever actually be possible. Space is fake and the only thing you need to do to realize this truth is to open your eyes and take an honest look. The only thing that is ever put in front of the public regarding space exploration is mere cartoons, drawings, photoshop renderings, CGI, and speculative imagination. That is all it has ever been and that is all it will ever be. The date for pressing beyond the exosphere with a manned mission continues to get pushed back. And it will always get pushed back, because at the end of the day the billions of trillions of dollars spent on these types of programs only ends up producing imagination and illustration.

But don’t take my tinfoil hat wearing word for it. Just take an honest unbiased step back and genuinely look at what you are being presented. You are being spoon fed cartoons. That is all the space community ever presents. And it is all they will ever continue to present.

The farthest man has ever gone is 400 miles up. And even at that height the radiation levels are so high that it is a health risk to travel to that altitude.

But who are we kidding right? I clearly am the one who is ignorant here… And not the millions of people around the world who chose to continue to believe that one day this endless stream of CGI and photoshop illustration nonsense will become a reality.

The funny thing is, this list actually could go on and on, but I chose to just show a few examples. You should take the time to go look at Elon Musk’s city to city travel proposal. It is hilarious nonsensical CGI and everyone is buying it.

Space is fake.

 

A conversation with a friend about NASA

The other day a very close friend and I were talking about re-entry for any manned mission entering the atmosphere. Anyone that reads my blog knows what my opinion is in regards to NASA. After having gone back and forth with my friend on the topic of the re-entry process of any object, manned or unmanned… I only have one question.

But, before I present my question, I want to point out that in the beginnings of NASA we are told that smashing into the atmosphere during re-entry can cause temperatures to rise above more than 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit (about 2,800 degrees Celsius). Not only does the exterior of the re-entry module reach above 5,000 degrees, but there are only a few inches of wall space between the exterior and interior of the cabin. Apparently NASA has developed a self consuming ablative heat shield that can withstand some pretty extreme temperatures (meaning that the heat experienced by the exterior of the object would not affect the temperature inside the object as it falls away from the craft).

But, don’t take my word for it… let’s ask NASA.

The initial conversation that I had with my friend was how I didn’t understand the mechanics of the heat shield they created and how it works so well. For example, in the above video the outside part is made of stainless steel. Stainless steel has a melting point of about 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit. Then, the honeycomb interior ablative heat shield in the video that is between the cabin and the stainless steel is nothing more than polymer fiberglass. Sadly enough, the melting point of this material also doesn’t even come close to being able to withstand 5,000 degrees (it has a melting point of about 2,200 degrees).

One other option that we are presented in the following video is pure silica-tiles (which again, sadly doesn’t have a melting point that reached 5,000 degrees). Although these tiles can withstand about 3,000 degrees, they were not used in the first video, but rather much later. Even still, that presents a problem.

The answer that finally clicked for me after having talked with my friend is the ceramic coating that was used. Apparently, NASA used a spray adhesive that was designed to melt away made of ceramic (which is pretty awesome considering the fact that it has a melting point of almost 6,900 degrees). If you spray enough of this stuff on and also consider the fact that re-entry time wasn’t anything more than a few minutes at most, this answer makes a lot of sense. However, the self consuming ablative heat shield in the first video was actually behind the stainless steel (notated throughout the entire first video with no mention of a ceramic outer layer). Again, the ablated material that was designed to dissipate upon re-entry in the first video was not on the outside of the stainless steel.  But, that is beside the point. Just for argument’s sake, let’s assume that the ceramic coating was applied in the first video. It very well could have been despite not being mentioned. Although I am still looking, the farthest back that I have been able to find this ceramic ablation in use by NASA only goes back as far as the early 1990’s.

This 1960’s document shows that re-entry exceeded the melting point of silica by more than 1,000 degrees. While this 1960’s document shows that the primary ablator  used during that time was 99.8% silica.

After having had this conversation with my friend and totally setting aside the conflicts that arise with re-entry (which was a lot of fun, because it made me evaluate and think, which is something I enjoy to do)… all it did was cause me to ask a new question.

Let’s assume that the stance my friend holds is the correct one.

With that, here is the question…

What happened to re-entry exceeding temperatures of 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit (about 2,800 degrees Celsius and above)?

yep.png

I guess they realized that such a temperature was a little too outlandish, so they dropped it down a bit. Who knows… it’s probably just me being ignorant. Good ol’ Nye or Tyson can probably solve it for us.

7ce

I am not claiming to have answers. I am presenting questions.

Proof that this is all one big Joke @NASA

When you listen to this guy in the video, please note what he is talking about. According to NASA they can use a smart-phone on the ground to control an orbital object on the ISS via Wi-Fi.

unnamed

You have got to be freaking kidding me. How in the world are people buying into this nonsense?

Please note that, according to NASA, the ISS is nearly 200 miles away traveling at almost 50 miles a second, 18,000 miles per hour, orbiting every 2 hours. How in the ever loving truth are we sending a WiFi signal 200 miles away, let alone not losing signal the moment it gets there? Every thirty minutes or so the ISS would be on the back side of the earth opposite of ground control. I had to look into the technology for myself. And lo-and-behold, NASA took it down.

I wonder why. Maybe, because… for once they realize they are claiming something absolutely absurd.

missing.png

What the heck, people… What the heck. This is so ridiculous.

Osiris, Bennu, sun worship, and @NASA

Osiris begot a son Horus who is referred to by the Egyptians as the morning Star. The hieroglyphics for this means divine wisdom. Egyptian kings were thought to be an incarnation of Horus. This was passed from father to son upon death. At the time of death the father was believed to merge and becomes one with Osiris. The Pyramid Texts describe early conceptions of an afterlife in terms of eternal travelling with the sun god among the stars.

I don’t know about you but I find it rather peculiar to find how much Sun Worship plays a vital role in how the modern world has been shaped and formed. And here we can see that NASA is no different once again.

The question here is; you can spot the similarities?

Lucifer, the light-bearer is a strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness. Lucifer, the Son of the Morning is known for trying to promise Eve divine wisdom. So, then… what in the world does any of that have to do with NASA? Well, I am glad you asked.

LM OSIRIS-REx TAG illustration v3.jpg

Here we go again with NASA and their lucifarian idolatry. It has gotten to the point where they are no longer hiding it anymore. And even still, the masses drool at the mockery and CGI nonsense as if it were the truth. They have provided the masses with a new orbital craft which just so happens to be named Osiris. Now, according to NASA’s website the orbital’s name was a total accident and the acronym just “happened” to cause the name; Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, Security. Seems legit to me, I guess. This craft is suggested to reach the meteor in 2018 after it was launched in 2016. And should return by the year 2021.

osiris03

The funny thing to consider is this.

If the naming for OsirisRex was an accident based on the acronym, then how it the ever loving truth did the coincidence of picking a meteor called Bennu come into play? Of all the rocks they could have picked, this Egyptian god just happens to be traveling toward the Egyptian deity bird known as Bennu?

Give me a break! You can’t make this stuff up if you wanted to. In the NASA PDF linked here, they tell us yet again that the naming was another total coincidence. Apparently, a third grader got to name the meteor. Please, tell me… what third grader is schooled in Egyptian mythology to that degree?

benu

The Bennu is an ancient Egyptian deity linked with the sun, creation, and rebirth (obviously). It may have been the inspiration for the phoenix in Greek mythology, which happens to represent transcendence through evolution. Considering the fact that we are currently trying to attempt to fulfill Satan’s promise of transcendence through self forced evolution, I can’t help but once again see the similarities… not to mention the fact that this bird is, yet again, another symbol of sun worship.

So, ummm… yeah. Like I said. You can’t make this stuff up if you wanted to. Good going NASA. Keep them coming. I love the CGI you put together this time. It was well done, in an absolutely ridiculous sort of way.

We are living in an era where things are beginning to be less hidden and more openly revealed for what they really are.

“For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad.”Luke 8:17

But hey, don’t listen to me. I’m clearly just ignorant.

Directional momentum in the vacuum; you say

Common physics will tell you one very simple fact. In order for an object to begin, or increase a directional momentum, force needs to be generated against an external object. To better clarify what I am talking about here are a few basic examples of what I mean.

jumping

In order for a dog to gain momentum in an upward motion force is generated in the dog’s legs as the animal propels itself upward as a result of pushing off of the ground beneath it. The same can be said about a bird in flight or a fish as it swims. In order for the bird to gain and or maintain momentum as if flies, it must use its wings as it generates force against another, all be it, outside force generating object. In the case of the bird that outside object is the air. For a fish, the forward momentum is clearly derived from its fins as the fish generates force through the water that engulfs the creature. The dog pushes off of the earth. The bird pushes off of the air. The fish pushes off of the water. Seems simple enough, right? In order for an object to generate momentum it needs to generate force with the assistance of another object.

So… what about the vacuum of space?

propoltion.png

Let’s actually set aside for a moment the fact that I could not find a “real” photo of a satellite, and take note of the propulsion method being used by each object as it transverses the vast expanse of the cosmic void.

Something doesn’t seem to add up, and I have to ask myself… what are these objects pushing off of in order to generate the momentum they need to travel through the vacuum? The one on the right shows multiple short range burst of energy that allows the object to twist and pivot in any direction it desires. How is it possible for an object in space to generate momentum in any direction without the aid of an outside object to generate force? Because, if the vacuum is exactly that… a void (nothingness), then when a satellite attempted to use a propulsion system such as this it would do absolutely nothing. The compressed energy as it is dispensed will be released into the vacuum and with nothing for that energy to press against, the object would not gain or reduce any existing momentum.

With that in mind let us think then about the possibility of space exploration. If we went to the Moon, and if we plan to visit Mars, then how did/can an object traveling through the vacuum slow down its momentum with this style of propulsion system in an attempt to establish orbit? Whatever speed and direction you were traveling when you left the surface of the earth would be all there is. No changing direction. No speeding up. No slowing down.

An object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an outside force. And since the vacuum is nothingness… any attempts at generating an “outside force” would result in nothingness. Pushing against nothing will generate nothing.

Space travel is fake. But what do I know, right? I’m just ignorant.

No Satellites in orbit? Flat Earth? What is all of this?

Okay, so I have personally decided that for the most part NASA is a joke. Most of their photos are clearly edited and there has even been legitimate documentation of verbal proof telling that NASA does digitally generate its photos of the Earth from space. This is fact. But does that mean that every single detail of NASA is false? I don’t know. There are a lot of people that claim there is nothing true about NASA. No moon, no ISS, no satellites in space orbit. With that said, we don’t have a single photo of the earth from space. All of the images are digital composites. They are not real. So, here’s the thing. Since there is this mounting debate regarding the ISS and whether or not if it is in fact in orbit, I decided to do a little digging of my own and as a result only have one question I was hoping to have answered by someone, anyone. These flat earthers suggest that there are no manmade objects in orbit. So, on my own I type in satellite in orbit into google images.  Oddly enough, there are no actual photos of one of these objects in space. Instead all I get are these fake CGI photos.

satallitesfromspace

With that in mind, I kept digging. If there are something like 20k of these things in orbit, surely there is an actual photo taken by an amateur photographer/astronomer. If they are up there we would have photos, right? Well, after looking deeper I came across these images of the algid manmade objects in orbit. For many people this will be proof enough. Here are the real photos I was looking for after all, right? End of the story. But honestly, this isn’t good enough for me.

photosfromearthofsat

And here is why; You are telling me that an amateur astronomer can take a detailed photo with his telescope of planets like Jupiter, Mars, and Saturn from that great of a distance. And yet, that same telescope can’t capture a high resolution image of a satellite only about 300 to 400 miles away? There is something wrong with that logic.

Now, I am not saying that the flat earthers and the anti-NASA movement is right. All I am saying is this; if an amateur astronomer can take decent quality images of an object  576,682,810 miles away, why are these satellite images so poor when these objects are only about 400 miles away? Now, some people may suggest that the object is moving too fast and you can’t get a clear shot of it because it is in motion. I can agree with that, yes. But at the same time… with the video qualities we have developed for the amateurs of the world, surely there are some decent photos of the ISS from Earth taken by an average person like you and me that are without question real. I am posting this blog not to say that the ISS and the satellites are fake. I am posting this in hopes that someone will provide me photo evidence outside of just these crappy grainy questionable specs on a black surface.

And if you read this and have questions to… I ask that you do the same. Go get me that picture! I want to see it and put this thing to rest.