Well, as I stated in my last post, I haven’t been able to set this Revelation sign down for some reason. I just keep looking at it and toward what potential signs might be in the sky that match what the bible has to say regarding that sign. With that, here is a quick update on what I have found.
First, I covered a good chunk of verses 1 through 3 in previous posts, which leads me to verse 4.
Revelation 12:4 – And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
So, basically in short, Draco the dragon constellation is going to be the cause of a meteor shower on October 7th. Exactly fifteen days after the great wonder in heaven, we have a dragon casting down stars.
Another cool thing that I noticed in this article is that the Harvest moon is mentioned. Not only is the Harvest moon tonight, and it will be huge and orange, but… I particularly like what it represents. Not only will this be the first in almost a decade, but it essentially symbolizes a time when the harvest is ripe and ready to be plucked from the earth (the bride perhaps?). Before the advent of electricity, laborers would work through the night on a harvest moon collecting the harvest since the moonlight was so bright. Its light is so bright that it allowed them to visibly work through the night collecting the fruits of their labor.
Mathew 9:37 – Then saith he unto his disciples, The harvest truly is plenteous, but the labourers are few (here Jesus is talking about spreading the gospel and growing the fold).
Is God telling us something?
Is it possible that the Revelation 12 events are still unfolding before us in the heavens right now. Could God be telling us that the harvest is ready and that soon Satan will be cast down and given just a short while?
Regardless of what God’s timing ends up being, I am still watching and hopeful.
Something exciting is happening. I can just feel it.
Then again, I’m probably just ignorant.
So, I decided to take a quick look at what new topics are being ramped up in the space community today just for the heck of it. And as always there is a lot going on. Something new is always being invented, proposed, or funded.
Just for starters, we have the Hubble spotting a comet. Then there is the unveiling of a Mars Space Station. Not to mention the proposal for a Pluto booster Lander. I think my favorite one however has to be the idea that Russia and America plan to build a station in orbit around the moon.
Hubble Spots Farthest-Ever Incoming Active Comet (This is a drawing)
Lockheed Martin unveils Mars space station and surface Lander (This is a drawing)
Space visionaries boost Pluto lander (This is a drawing)
NASA teams up with Russia for new station near the moon. (This is a drawing)
I find it funny how so many of us take the time to defend the idea of space exploration as if it were some truly real thing that could ever actually be possible. Space is fake and the only thing you need to do to realize this truth is to open your eyes and take an honest look. The only thing that is ever put in front of the public regarding space exploration is mere cartoons, drawings, photoshop renderings, CGI, and speculative imagination. That is all it has ever been and that is all it will ever be. The date for pressing beyond the exosphere with a manned mission continues to get pushed back. And it will always get pushed back, because at the end of the day the billions of trillions of dollars spent on these types of programs only ends up producing imagination and illustration.
But don’t take my tinfoil hat wearing word for it. Just take an honest unbiased step back and genuinely look at what you are being presented. You are being spoon fed cartoons. That is all the space community ever presents. And it is all they will ever continue to present.
The farthest man has ever gone is 400 miles up. And even at that height the radiation levels are so high that it is a health risk to travel to that altitude.
But who are we kidding right? I clearly am the one who is ignorant here… And not the millions of people around the world who chose to continue to believe that one day this endless stream of CGI and photoshop illustration nonsense will become a reality.
The funny thing is, this list actually could go on and on, but I chose to just show a few examples. You should take the time to go look at Elon Musk’s city to city travel proposal. It is hilarious nonsensical CGI and everyone is buying it.
Space is fake.
The other day a very close friend and I were talking about re-entry for any manned mission entering the atmosphere. Anyone that reads my blog knows what my opinion is in regards to NASA. After having gone back and forth with my friend on the topic of the re-entry process of any object, manned or unmanned… I only have one question.
But, before I present my question, I want to point out that in the beginnings of NASA we are told that smashing into the atmosphere during re-entry can cause temperatures to rise above more than 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit (about 2,800 degrees Celsius). Not only does the exterior of the re-entry module reach above 5,000 degrees, but there are only a few inches of wall space between the exterior and interior of the cabin. Apparently NASA has developed a self consuming ablative heat shield that can withstand some pretty extreme temperatures (meaning that the heat experienced by the exterior of the object would not affect the temperature inside the object as it falls away from the craft).
But, don’t take my word for it… let’s ask NASA.
The initial conversation that I had with my friend was how I didn’t understand the mechanics of the heat shield they created and how it works so well. For example, in the above video the outside part is made of stainless steel. Stainless steel has a melting point of about 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit. Then, the honeycomb interior ablative heat shield in the video that is between the cabin and the stainless steel is nothing more than polymer fiberglass. Sadly enough, the melting point of this material also doesn’t even come close to being able to withstand 5,000 degrees (it has a melting point of about 2,200 degrees).
One other option that we are presented in the following video is pure silica-tiles (which again, sadly doesn’t have a melting point that reached 5,000 degrees). Although these tiles can withstand about 3,000 degrees, they were not used in the first video, but rather much later. Even still, that presents a problem.
The answer that finally clicked for me after having talked with my friend is the ceramic coating that was used. Apparently, NASA used a spray adhesive that was designed to melt away made of ceramic (which is pretty awesome considering the fact that it has a melting point of almost 6,900 degrees). If you spray enough of this stuff on and also consider the fact that re-entry time wasn’t anything more than a few minutes at most, this answer makes a lot of sense. However, the self consuming ablative heat shield in the first video was actually behind the stainless steel (notated throughout the entire first video with no mention of a ceramic outer layer). Again, the ablated material that was designed to dissipate upon re-entry in the first video was not on the outside of the stainless steel. But, that is beside the point. Just for argument’s sake, let’s assume that the ceramic coating was applied in the first video. It very well could have been despite not being mentioned. Although I am still looking, the farthest back that I have been able to find this ceramic ablation in use by NASA only goes back as far as the early 1990’s.
This 1960’s document shows that re-entry exceeded the melting point of silica by more than 1,000 degrees. While this 1960’s document shows that the primary ablator used during that time was 99.8% silica.
After having had this conversation with my friend and totally setting aside the conflicts that arise with re-entry (which was a lot of fun, because it made me evaluate and think, which is something I enjoy to do)… all it did was cause me to ask a new question.
Let’s assume that the stance my friend holds is the correct one.
With that, here is the question…
What happened to re-entry exceeding temperatures of 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit (about 2,800 degrees Celsius and above)?
I guess they realized that such a temperature was a little too outlandish, so they dropped it down a bit. Who knows… it’s probably just me being ignorant. Good ol’ Nye or Tyson can probably solve it for us.
I am not claiming to have answers. I am presenting questions.
Earth’s orbital plane is known as the ecliptic plane, and Earth’s tilt is known to astronomers as the obliquity of the ecliptic, being the angle between the ecliptic and the celestial equator on the celestial sphere. Earth currently has an axial tilt of about 23.4°.
An axial plane is based on the 90° pivot. With that in mind I find it rather strange to consider that the opposing tilt of the earth equates to a rather interesting number. What I mean by that is this; if we were to subtract 23.4° from 90°, we get exactly 66.6°.
What a wonderful coincidence.
But, it doesn’t stop there. According to Live Science, we are also carrying a velocity of roughly 66,600 MPH as we fly through space around the sun.
What another wonderful coincidence.
Or even better… what about the fact that the curvature of the earth for one mile squared equates to exactly 0.666 ft. If you don’t believe me you can do the math yourself using this program.
I bet, if you decided to not stop there and continued to look at the math behind how the secular world describes their godless creation, the coincidences wouldn’t stop here.
But then again, who are we kidding… right? I clearly am just ignorant.
If you want to believe you are flying through space at 66,600 miles per hour around the sun while on an opposing tilt of 66.6° with a radial drop of 0.666 ft per mile squared under your feet, you go right head.
I think I’ll put my feet on the bible instead of the wisdom of secular men, thank you very much.
1 Chr. 16:30: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable.”
Ps. 93:1: “Thou hast fixed the earth immovable and firm …”
Ps. 96:10: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable …”
Now, don’t get me wrong… I do realize that there are plenty of verses that suggest the world does move. For example:
Ps. 99:1: “The Lord reigneth … let the earth be moved.”
Job 26:7: “He … hangeth the earth upon nothing.
Is. 24:19: “the earth is moved exceedingly.”
With that in mind I am neither arguing for or against the motion of the earth. All I am getting at here is the simple fact that we are so quick to settle on the side of the secular world when it comes to Biblical creation. If we are so quick to stand up against things like the theory of evolution, why then would describing the creation of earth and the celestial bodies above be any different? Rather than standing on the truth of God’s word, we have given the Biblical attributes of cosmology over to the wisdom of men, diminishing that portion of the Bible to allegory rather than truth.
Just think about it.
If Satan really is in charge right now, and his goal is to deceive men into believing that God does not exist, the quickest way to do something like that would be to distort their view on creation itself.
But… I digress.
I’m clearly just ignorant. All of those numbers above are clearly just a coincidence.
Whatever… if you want to be asleep, at this point you are doing it by choice. The great deception is at hand.
And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. – Revelation 12:9
Please note that it doesn’t say he will deceive some, or just the unbelievers. No… it says all.
Anyway, I’m ignorant.
Talk to you later.
Well, today is my birthday. And to celebrate my birthday, Sarah and I went all the way out to the McDonald Observatory in West Texas. This place is in the middle of nowhere up on top of some pretty epic mountains. Today, while we were there we not only got to visit the actual telescopes (one of which I had the pleasure of personally controlling manually), but we also observed the sun.
It was a pretty cool experience and I have to admit, the scenery on the way there was breathtaking.
But, I will say… there is one thing that today’s trip got me thinking about. First off, the Polaris Star (also known as the North Star) is stationary in the night sky. I asked the tour guide how it was possible for the North Star to be stationary in the night sky while we traverse the void of space in four directions at once. He managed to not grasp what I was actually asking, and instead mentioned a 5th motion that he posed does change the North Star dramatically. Not only has this motion of Polaris never been observed in the last 6,000 years of recorded cosmology, but it apparently happens every 27,000 years. Again, something that can’t be observed. Makes sense to me.
How can we state a fact like that without the ability to actually observe it? Seems like science… lol.
But, anyway… that isn’t what this blog is about. This blog is about the sun… because, at the end of the day that was what the main part of the tour was about.
So… according to modern day astronomy the sun is a star. Not only that, but it is one of the smallest stars. According to this same modern day teaching of the cosmos the sun was formed prior to the earth and is currently 93 million miles away.
So then… why is it that everything we are taught about the cosmos today is absolutely backwards from what the bible says? According to the bible the earth was made first (not the sun). The Sun and moon were made separate from the stars (meaning the sun is not a star). The sun and moon are both called great lights (according to the Copernican Principle our sun is not great when compared to other stars). The bible also says that the sun, moon, and stars all exist inside of the firmament. And that this firmament is where the birds fly.
So then, which is true?
Are we to believe as Christians that the bible is the inerrant truth (except when it talks about science, which makes it no longer inerrant)? Or, are we going to believe the cabalistic indoctrinations of the Copernican Principle of Heliocentric Cosmological Evolution?
Rather than being long winder, trying to make a lot of points (which I feel I could easily do) I want to just leave you with this thought.
Why is it that literally everything we are told about the cosmos is the exact opposite of what the bible says?
Anyway, my birthday trip was fun. Space exploration is fake. The sun, moon, and stars are close and small. Satellites do not exist beyond the stratosphere (all we are ever shown is CGI and cartoons).
The earth is motionless. I know this to be true because that is what my senses tell me and that is what my bible tells me.
The earth was made first. The one way speed of light is assumed. With that said, everything you have been told about the cosmos is an assumption.
Have a good day, and thanks for reading. For my birthday, my challenge to you is to go back and read what the bible says about the cosmos. What it has to say is very clear… very clear indeed.