Sometimes a post can just speak for itself



Why live practical when you can dream big instead?

So, Elon Musk is making some big proposals as seen in the above video. Rather than point out the simple fact that none of this was actual footage, but instead mere CGI nonsense… I want to make a proposal of my own.

Rather than insist that you can accomplish such a lofty dream within the next 6 years, why not prove that you can by demonstrating your capabilities somewhere closer to home? Show me that this lofty dream about Mars is truly possible by accomplishing it on the moon first. The funny thing is, they won’t.

Because, they can’t.

Elon Musk and SpaceX have yet to prove they can do something small. So, why then is the world drooling in awe at their lofty dreams? Build a moon base and prove that is it possible to sustain life outside of earth… and then we will talk.

But instead of proving it to be possible we will just skip that part and believe on blind faith that it is possible simply because a man who claims to be wise told us so.

Give me a break, people. Nothing that SpaceX has produces is real. I have yet to watch a single launch/landing that didn’t cut to CGI or change camera just at the right moment resulting in absolutely zero uninterrupted shots of a successful landing.

Things like that are generally called misdirection in the world of magic.

And that’s all this is… magical hopes provides by magical people that do nothing true in the real world.

If this junk is possible, prove it first by doing something more realistic like a base on the moon. Why on earth would we skip such a step unless this is nothing more than lofty misdirection in the first place?

Lastly, I would like to point out that SpaceX is claiming that they will accomplish this first phases of this task within the next 6 years. I do not at all find this to be coincidental when you consider the current signs of the times. If you don’t know what I am talking about, then go read the last post I did about the stars.

Those that are in control of the delusion are running out of time and they realize that…. which is why the claims are becoming big and bolder with tighter deadlines.

Rant over. Space is fake.

New in the realm of Fake Space Exploration

So, I decided to take a quick look at what new topics are being ramped up in the space community today just for the heck of it. And as always there is a lot going on. Something new is always being invented, proposed, or funded.

Just for starters, we have the Hubble spotting a comet. Then there is the unveiling of a Mars Space Station. Not to mention the proposal for a Pluto booster Lander. I think my favorite one however has to be the idea that Russia and America plan to build a station in orbit around the moon.

Hubble Spots Farthest-Ever Incoming Active Comet (This is a drawing)


Lockheed Martin unveils Mars space station and surface Lander (This is a drawing)


Space visionaries boost Pluto lander (This is a drawing)


NASA teams up with Russia for new station near the moon. (This is a drawing)


I find it funny how so many of us take the time to defend the idea of space exploration as if it were some truly real thing that could ever actually be possible. Space is fake and the only thing you need to do to realize this truth is to open your eyes and take an honest look. The only thing that is ever put in front of the public regarding space exploration is mere cartoons, drawings, photoshop renderings, CGI, and speculative imagination. That is all it has ever been and that is all it will ever be. The date for pressing beyond the exosphere with a manned mission continues to get pushed back. And it will always get pushed back, because at the end of the day the billions of trillions of dollars spent on these types of programs only ends up producing imagination and illustration.

But don’t take my tinfoil hat wearing word for it. Just take an honest unbiased step back and genuinely look at what you are being presented. You are being spoon fed cartoons. That is all the space community ever presents. And it is all they will ever continue to present.

The farthest man has ever gone is 400 miles up. And even at that height the radiation levels are so high that it is a health risk to travel to that altitude.

But who are we kidding right? I clearly am the one who is ignorant here… And not the millions of people around the world who chose to continue to believe that one day this endless stream of CGI and photoshop illustration nonsense will become a reality.

The funny thing is, this list actually could go on and on, but I chose to just show a few examples. You should take the time to go look at Elon Musk’s city to city travel proposal. It is hilarious nonsensical CGI and everyone is buying it.

Space is fake.


NASA rant of the day. So many sixes my head hurts

So, today’s thought isn’t really anything new for the stuff you might see me post on this site. It is instead a series of unknown presuppositions that somehow ridiculously line up with one another, creating what I like to call “irony at its finest“.

I recently wrote a blog post about NASA and how they are founded in Pantheistic Gnostic concepts that idolize a plethora of different Greek gods. I also took the time to point out what NASA actually means in Hebrew (deceiver).


When you consider the fact that NASA is founded in the occult teachings of these types of Greek gods, I find it rather peculiar that Jack Parsons, one of the founding members of NASA, was a devotee of the one and only Aleister Crowley. This man was a Satanist through and through and actually referred to himself as the beast.

With that in mind, it is not at all surprising to find things like the fact that Peggy Whitson is about to break the record for longest days in space for any astronaut. When she comes back from space in just a few weeks her record will have reached exactly 666 days in space.  On the same day that they congratulated her for this upcoming accomplishment they handed out an award called the “Epic Red Dragon“. But, you can just got back and read that blog post to get all of that info if you want.


With those things in mind, do I really need to get into the details of how ironic it is to find the number 666 literally ingrained into where we are told we live? Because, at the end of the day… the people that are presenting the absolute most evidence to back the Copernican Principle of Heliocentric Cosmological Evolution would have to be NASA.

With that said, we are told that the earth is flying around the sun at 18.5 miles per second. This just so happens to come out to 66,600 miles per hour.


We are also told that the earth is tilted at a 23.4 degree access off of 90. This would in turn mean that the opposing tilt of the earth is equal to 66.6 degrees.


But it doesn’t stop there. We are also told that the radius of the earth is exactly 0.666 feet per mile squared. By using this earth curvature calculator you can determine how much curvature exists not only against distance, but against height as well. With that, I have set the curvature to read from ground level with a total distance of one mile.


So, totally setting aside the fact that all of this seems just a little bit too coincidental, when exactly did we start calling both the seas and the dry land the same thing?

Genesis 1:10And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.

God didn’t name both the seas and dry land Earth. At least that’s how I am reading it. The dry land had a name… and the water had a name. With that, when did we start calling both the dry land and the oceans the same name?

If you wan’t to believe in the Copernican Principle which is the foundation of the heliocentric big bang cosmological evolutionary theory, you go right ahead. More power to ya. But, honestly… something seems a little fishy to me.

But, what do i know right? I’m just ignorant.

But seriously though, if you ever just wanted to see how much of an idiot I really am, just scroll through the science page on my site. You will learn real quick how ignorant I really am.

A conversation with a friend about NASA

The other day a very close friend and I were talking about re-entry for any manned mission entering the atmosphere. Anyone that reads my blog knows what my opinion is in regards to NASA. After having gone back and forth with my friend on the topic of the re-entry process of any object, manned or unmanned… I only have one question.

But, before I present my question, I want to point out that in the beginnings of NASA we are told that smashing into the atmosphere during re-entry can cause temperatures to rise above more than 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit (about 2,800 degrees Celsius). Not only does the exterior of the re-entry module reach above 5,000 degrees, but there are only a few inches of wall space between the exterior and interior of the cabin. Apparently NASA has developed a self consuming ablative heat shield that can withstand some pretty extreme temperatures (meaning that the heat experienced by the exterior of the object would not affect the temperature inside the object as it falls away from the craft).

But, don’t take my word for it… let’s ask NASA.

The initial conversation that I had with my friend was how I didn’t understand the mechanics of the heat shield they created and how it works so well. For example, in the above video the outside part is made of stainless steel. Stainless steel has a melting point of about 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit. Then, the honeycomb interior ablative heat shield in the video that is between the cabin and the stainless steel is nothing more than polymer fiberglass. Sadly enough, the melting point of this material also doesn’t even come close to being able to withstand 5,000 degrees (it has a melting point of about 2,200 degrees).

One other option that we are presented in the following video is pure silica-tiles (which again, sadly doesn’t have a melting point that reached 5,000 degrees). Although these tiles can withstand about 3,000 degrees, they were not used in the first video, but rather much later. Even still, that presents a problem.

The answer that finally clicked for me after having talked with my friend is the ceramic coating that was used. Apparently, NASA used a spray adhesive that was designed to melt away made of ceramic (which is pretty awesome considering the fact that it has a melting point of almost 6,900 degrees). If you spray enough of this stuff on and also consider the fact that re-entry time wasn’t anything more than a few minutes at most, this answer makes a lot of sense. However, the self consuming ablative heat shield in the first video was actually behind the stainless steel (notated throughout the entire first video with no mention of a ceramic outer layer). Again, the ablated material that was designed to dissipate upon re-entry in the first video was not on the outside of the stainless steel.  But, that is beside the point. Just for argument’s sake, let’s assume that the ceramic coating was applied in the first video. It very well could have been despite not being mentioned. Although I am still looking, the farthest back that I have been able to find this ceramic ablation in use by NASA only goes back as far as the early 1990’s.

This 1960’s document shows that re-entry exceeded the melting point of silica by more than 1,000 degrees. While this 1960’s document shows that the primary ablator  used during that time was 99.8% silica.

After having had this conversation with my friend and totally setting aside the conflicts that arise with re-entry (which was a lot of fun, because it made me evaluate and think, which is something I enjoy to do)… all it did was cause me to ask a new question.

Let’s assume that the stance my friend holds is the correct one.

With that, here is the question…

What happened to re-entry exceeding temperatures of 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit (about 2,800 degrees Celsius and above)?


I guess they realized that such a temperature was a little too outlandish, so they dropped it down a bit. Who knows… it’s probably just me being ignorant. Good ol’ Nye or Tyson can probably solve it for us.


I am not claiming to have answers. I am presenting questions.

He’s going the distance. He’s going for… NASA

As of this month, NASA’s Curiosity Rover has apparently been on the surface of Mars for five years covering a distance of almost 10 miles on the alien terrain. With this new update from NASA and the announcement of five long years of success and counting for the Mars Rover, I decided to chime in.

Now, there is the obvious question; who took this photo seeing as to how Curiosity is the larger of the robots supposedly roaming Mars? The shot is taken from above, which rules out any of the other robots as an answer, let alone the fact that their locations are vastly spread apart.


But that isn’t today’s post. No, today I wanted to ask a different question. But before I ask my question, let’s watch this one minute video that breaks down the basics of how the rover is actually driven by sending signals from earth and back.

So basically, in a nutshell we are to believe that NASA is sending a signal through earth’s atmosphere, across the vacuum of space, through Mars’ atmosphere, and back.

Okay, here we go…

Mars is literally supposed to be 33.9 million miles away. The closest is has ever gotten is 3.5 million miles away. Please tell me how you expect me to believe that you are sending a signal that far while also calculating the exact location the signal needs to hit in order to reach its destination when taking into account that you are spinning 1,000 miles an hour. Let alone the fact that Mars is traveling a speed that is supposed to be 66,500 miles an hour while also spinning at about 960 miles per hour as well. Couple that together with the fact that it can take anywhere between 4 to 24 minutes for the signal from earth to reach its destination. Let’s just say that by the time the signal from earth gets there, the rover and the planet are no longer in the same location.

Then there is the issue with the axis rotation of both planets. What happens when the signal being sent and the location of the receiver are on opposing sides as shown here?


Now, before you get your panties in a twist and start spitting silly things at me like “they have satellites for that dumb-dumb“, take a look at this. In this NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory video link we have NASA claiming that they can send a signal through the freaking sun from earth to Mars and back. Sure, the file may lose some of its data, but we can always “photoshop” that back in later… which is why they take a vacation that week. This still doesn’t change the fact that they are claiming they could send data through the sun if they wanted to. Give me a freaking break people. Someone, please show me that awesomeness in real life. I want to see someone send a signal from one side of the earth to the other without going around it. No, instead… let’s do what NASA does. Send the signal through the planet. If they can do it with the sun, should be no problem, right?

If they can send a signal through the sun while still only losing parts of the data, then wouldn’t they be able to send a signal through the earth as well? Because, heck… seems to me that when the earth and Mars are in awkward positions like the illustration above, that’s all they’re doing.

That signal will just go right on through… don’t worry about it.


Anyway, this rant has run its course. I am not claiming to know anything. All I am getting at here is this. Based on the information that NASA presents to us about what they are actually capable of with the aid of modern technology, we should be able to do a lot more as a civilian civilization. For example, if we can send a signal 33.9 million miles away while passing said signal information through the freaking sun, then why in the universe do I live in a world where I sometimes lose cell phone reception? Seems to me like the human race should already have that one solved.

But hey, who am I kidding. I’m ignorant and just don’t understand science and math. If I understood me some learnin‘, this stuff would add up. Heck, better yet… why not just do some research on your own? A great place to start would be Devon Island’s Roving the Arctic.

Space is fake.

Either that, or NASA needs to start up its own cell phone provider company to help fund projects. Seems like their coverage would be out of this world.


The ISS and the Blue Screen of DEATH

So, today the Soyuz MS-05 Docked to the International Space Station, bringing along with it three new NASA crew members. Considering the fact that NASA changes crew members on the ISS all the time, this isn’t really all that spectacular. Unless of course, you stop and consider the actual severity of it all and how it tends to play out the same way every single time. If you want to, you can watch the entire video below. But, honestly I will just hit the highlights for you.

For starters, the ISS is roughly 250 miles above the surface of the earth in an area known as the thermosphere. In this area of the atmosphere, the temperatures can rise to nearly 3,500 degrees F. This is a rather peculiar predicament when we consider the high quantity of aluminum that exists on the outer portion of the ISS (the melting point of aluminum is only 1,200 degrees F).

Not only does the ISS exist in this hot region of space below the exosphere, but it is traveling at nearly 17,150 MPH. At this speed it only takes the ISS an hour and a half to do one full revolution around the earth. That is pretty freaking fast if you ask me. To put this into perspective, that is about 5 miles a second.

That right there has me asking one simple question about G force.

How in the world is someone able to withstand a constant pull of more than 9G while moving at that speed for that long? G force is based on the radius of motion accompanied by speed. And if the astronauts on the Soyuz are reaching a speed of 17,000 MPH with a radius of 6.371 million meters (radius of the earth) during acceleration, they are experiencing a constant pull of more than 9G the entire trip to the ISS. How in the world are they reaching that speed with only a 200 mile window between them and their destination? At 5 miles a second it would have passed up the ISS by 100 miles in less than 60 seconds. And, how are they not blacking out? Someone has to stay conscious if they intend to dock without crashing headlong into the ISS at more than 5 miles a second… right? And before you tell me that there is zero G, they are in the thermosphere… not the exosphere. The thermosphere is still an atmosphere rich area. So… please explain how they aren’t blacking out. And then, when they do dock at that obnoxious of a speed how is it that they are not bumping one another completely off course out of control? One little bump or unanticipated nudge would knock the ISS off of its current orbital path by more than 5 miles a second into a new direction. One little misstep nudge could have the ISS 10 miles away in less than two seconds. How is it logically possible for a docking to even occur when you consider these things as a reality?


With all of this type of stuff in mind I would like to take a moment to point out the NASA routine for docking onto the ISS. For starters, make sure that you get some super legit footage of the crew as they approach (clearly showing that they are traveling faster than you are in order to catch up to you while clearly not being at an altitude of 200 miles high).  Then… when they dock, make sure that you are not on the sun lit side of the earth according to protocol as usual (doing this helps make the illusion of a 17,150 MPH collision between two manned objects seem plausible). They are always on the dark side when the dock occurs leaving very little to be seen. Then, when the sun comes back around all of the work is magically done with everyone at ground control applauding the diligent efforts of everyone involved (every time).


And of course… what NASA docking onto the ISS wouldn’t be complete without the dreaded blue screen of death. That’s right, people… that major moment when the cabins have pressurized and we are opening the hatch to bring the two crews together the camera goes blue (every single time). And whala!!! Just like you know NASA does every time, the camera comes back on just in time for that money shot of all the crew members standing in a row with their headsets on ready to talk to the public with smiling faces (because, you know… that wasn’t just a life and death situation just now). Apparently all Astronauts have nerves of iron. Their blood pressure isn’t through the ruff right now or anything…

Let’s totally forget the fact that the crew members in the Soyuz were wearing totally different outfits when they took off. Let’s totally forget that they just also spent more than two hours reach speeds of 17,000+ MPH with a radial velocity of more than 9G’s for the entire ride (the average person blacks out at 5G). But hey, no big deal… no sweat. No pale faces. No need to check vitals after going that fast in that short of a time while creating an intentional head on collision while on the verge of a blackout with a $150 billion dollar piece of equipment. We will check vitals after the interview.

Give me a break, people. There is no physical way for two opposing objects traveling at that speed to connect with such grace.

NASA is a liar. And that is all there is to it.

If you think I am making this stuff up, go find me footage of any astronauts passing through the airlock for either a spacewalk or during a docking/departure. You will not find it, because there is none. All you will ever find is the blue screen of death. And of course, today was no different.


But don’t take my word for it… let’s watch this G force compilation.