Baptism in a van down by the river

Today was an awesome day to be out at the water, grilling food, playing music, and watching people get baptized. I will just let the following photos speak for themselves. It was a blast and Sarah and I are beyond blessed to have found a home among this community of fellow believers.

1

2

3

4

Jesus is real… and he is headed back weather you are ready for it or not.

Advertisements

NASA rant of the day. So many sixes my head hurts

So, today’s thought isn’t really anything new for the stuff you might see me post on this site. It is instead a series of unknown presuppositions that somehow ridiculously line up with one another, creating what I like to call “irony at its finest“.

I recently wrote a blog post about NASA and how they are founded in Pantheistic Gnostic concepts that idolize a plethora of different Greek gods. I also took the time to point out what NASA actually means in Hebrew (deceiver).

occt

When you consider the fact that NASA is founded in the occult teachings of these types of Greek gods, I find it rather peculiar that Jack Parsons, one of the founding members of NASA, was a devotee of the one and only Aleister Crowley. This man was a Satanist through and through and actually referred to himself as the beast.

With that in mind, it is not at all surprising to find things like the fact that Peggy Whitson is about to break the record for longest days in space for any astronaut. When she comes back from space in just a few weeks her record will have reached exactly 666 days in space.  On the same day that they congratulated her for this upcoming accomplishment they handed out an award called the “Epic Red Dragon“. But, you can just got back and read that blog post to get all of that info if you want.

666dys.png

With those things in mind, do I really need to get into the details of how ironic it is to find the number 666 literally ingrained into where we are told we live? Because, at the end of the day… the people that are presenting the absolute most evidence to back the Copernican Principle of Heliocentric Cosmological Evolution would have to be NASA.

With that said, we are told that the earth is flying around the sun at 18.5 miles per second. This just so happens to come out to 66,600 miles per hour.

speed

We are also told that the earth is tilted at a 23.4 degree access off of 90. This would in turn mean that the opposing tilt of the earth is equal to 66.6 degrees.

tilt

But it doesn’t stop there. We are also told that the radius of the earth is exactly 0.666 feet per mile squared. By using this earth curvature calculator you can determine how much curvature exists not only against distance, but against height as well. With that, I have set the curvature to read from ground level with a total distance of one mile.

feet

So, totally setting aside the fact that all of this seems just a little bit too coincidental, when exactly did we start calling both the seas and the dry land the same thing?

Genesis 1:10And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.

God didn’t name both the seas and dry land Earth. At least that’s how I am reading it. The dry land had a name… and the water had a name. With that, when did we start calling both the dry land and the oceans the same name?

If you wan’t to believe in the Copernican Principle which is the foundation of the heliocentric big bang cosmological evolutionary theory, you go right ahead. More power to ya. But, honestly… something seems a little fishy to me.

But, what do i know right? I’m just ignorant.

But seriously though, if you ever just wanted to see how much of an idiot I really am, just scroll through the science page on my site. You will learn real quick how ignorant I really am.

It’s all a coincidence – Jesus would have loved NASA

Silverstein named the Mercury program and the Apollo program after mythical Greek gods while he was serving as NASA’s Director of Space Flight Programs in the late 1950s. But that isn’t the only Greek god based references that we seem to have with NASA. For example, one of Saturn’s moons is named Pan (not to mention the fact that Saturn is the Greek god Cronus). I just find it funny that NASA’s early work was littered with this type of dogma. For example, the 1966 mission was named Gemini (Castor and Pollux, the Greek gods born to Leda and Argonauts). And you had the Saturn launches in the 1970’s.

Of all the NASA programs, Apollo is the one that seems to be the most infamous (and for good reason).

So, who exactly is Apollo?

apollo-chariot-1

Apollo is the god of many things including, the sun, music, and light and knowledge. With that in mind I find it rather ironic that Satan meets this exact same description. The bible mentions similar attributes of the devil. For example we find in Ezekiel that Satan played a few different types of interments as part of his role in Heaven and the garden. Then, shrouded as a messenger of light he told Eve that he could help her gain knowledge.

111.png

There are a few other odd coincidences that I would love to point out real quick when referencing Apollo, NASA, and the bible. For one thing I find it rather hilarious that Apollo is riding down from the heavens in the clouds on a chariot of exactly four horses. Because, last I checked there is this part in the bible where we have the 4 horsemen and the rider that comes down on them.

Not to mention the fact that Jesus has 12 disciples and Satan is all about mirroring the things of God. And what do you know… there were 12 Apollo missions.

What a coincidence!

gods.png

But seriously though, in the bible when Eve was beguiled by the serpent into eating the fruit, the Hebrew word which means “to deceive” in that portion of text was none other than “Nasha“. And the Hebrew word which means to “take away or remove” is another pronunciation of the same word “Nasa“.

With that, NASA is here to deceive the world by taking away or removing God through an indoctrination of modern day “knowledge” while disguised as a barer of light with the intent of bringing in an era of technological advances for the development of mankind as a species (you know… evolution).

Jesus would have been all about the space program… don’t you think?

Space is fake. Anything beyond the stratosphere is nothing more than speculation and artist illustrations. If you want the truth, you need to look at what the bible says. Because, last I checked the bible said the stars were the angles… and that one day they were going to fall onto the earth. Please explain how that is possible if the stars are billions or trillions of gazillions of light years away while also being so massive that they would consume the earth before ever actually coming close to it.

Strong delusion much?

But, who are we kidding… right? I am just ignorant and Jesus really would have loved modern day cosmology and the craftiness of mans modern day deception.

 

Sending Man to the Moon one tourist attraction at a time

You know, it’s one thing to blow up a bunch of land in Arizona to so that it looks like the moon in an attempt to prepare for actually walking on the moon. But, it is another thing entirely to want to make sure that your mountains in the background are exactly the same. Because, you know… what better way to be prepared mentally than with as accurate as possible a visual backdrop as you can get. We wouldn’t want our Apollo 17 astronauts feeling uneasy on the moon because of a potential mountain variation in their peripheral while trying to do experiments on the moon.

3

With that, it makes sense that NASA chose Cinder Lake, Arizona when deciding to blow it up to make it look like the surface of the moon. Not only was there enough space there to lay out some awesome moon terrain, but it had a few familiar mountains in the distance as well. Perfect placement when you consider wanting to keep the astronauts at ease once actually on the real moon (it’s best to keep things familiar you know).

But, hey… don’t take my word for it. This is an actual place that you can go visit to this day in Cinder Lake, Arizona. And… if you look at it on Google Maps you can still see the moon craters that NASA put down. They aren’t as promontory as they used to be, what with age, weather, and time.

lake.png

As a matter of fact, people go visit it all the time… including good ‘ol Buzz himself (seen in the cowboy hat). Man, those mountains looks familiar.

2

But… who are we kidding, right? NASA would never lie to us. The government would never do a thing like that… would they? Then again, like I said before. These mountains do seem oddly familiar.

1

But what do I know, right? I am ignorant.

So, here is the thing… God himself said that in the last days that he would allow strong delusion. Personally, I can’t think of anything stronger than fooling the entire world into a distorted view of creation that favors the Copernican Principle… which in turn validates the big bang… which in turn validates evolution… pushing God himself out of the picture.

2 Thessalonians 2:7-12Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders. And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

And for those of you that want to come back with  with something like…

how could the moon landing be fake if so many people around the world were involved in making it happen?”

Well, let’s just watch this short little video from Smarter Every Day, a youtuber that believes we did land on the moon. In this video we will learn several things which are listed below the video.

#1 Don Pettit is an idiot. He can’t pronouns the name of a man who has the same pronunciation as a module that Don works with every single day.

#2 By opening the windows of the Cupola you no longer maintain a pressure seal inside the ISS (you are loosing air).

#3 The seal is just a simple rubber ring (the exosphere is 3,000 degrees. The melting point of that seal is only 300 degrees and the host of the show knows that is absurd by his reaction).

#4 If a leak did occur, Don Pettit didn’t actually know the emergency procedure and you can tell that he was thrown off by these types of questions. The man spent more than 370 days in space with more than 13 spacewalks… and his answer is a stuttering “I don’t know“.

#5 It’s called real good engineering.

#6 the vacuum of space is being held back by two little pieces of rubber.

#7 We learn that the man who made the mechanism for the Cupola windows more than 20 years prior was left out of the loop. He never knew if they used his design (with that, how could they fake it if so many people were involved? It’s called a need to know basis). You do your part and you are left in the dark about everything else.

So… with that, if a distortion of creation itself resulting in the denial of a creator isn’t the strong delusion while still agreeing that we are in the end times… then by all means, please tell me… what type of a delusion could be any stronger than this?

Because, at the end of the day it is a lie. Space is fake.

Basic structure of song 2 officially recorded

Well, it looks like this 3 song daethcore EP is actually coming together. Today I spend a few hours with my friend Noah recording the drums, bass, and rhythm guitar for a second song. Only one more song to go and we will be ready to drop some vocals on it. After that, do some mixing… come up with a cheesy doom metal band name and an EP album cover… and call it complete. It has been a lot of fun thrashing out some break downs on the guitar.

More on this project as it develops.

unnamed

Hidden messages within modern commercials

Today’s post is another one regarding the degradation of our society away from the core values of morality.

While I was in the break room this morning I happened to catch this 30 second car commercial. For one, it shows how no one actually communicates anymore. Instead, people find themselves consumed by their devices (or better put; vices). The thing that I took away from this commercial however was the last thing the driver had to say.

He said, and I quote… “I have a brand new putter you don’t even know about. It’s awesome.” The way in which he said it, implying that it would remain a secret did not sit well with me at all.

Having pointed that out, I like how this commercial is so subtle with its none car insurance related message. First of all, we see the nice car, the beautiful healthy kids and pretty wife, as well as the insane amount of gadgets everyone in the car has. As a result it is very easy to assume that this is what success is supposed to look like.

Because, honestly… this family seems to have it together when you consider those aspects of the visuals we are presented (new car. Tons of expensive toys, etc.).

But, I digress.

Not only is this family disconnected as a result of being connected to their vices. It also implies through the driver’s final statement that there is a level of dishonesty, resentment, or even an intentional withholding of information within the family unit. Despite the fact that this family appears to have it together based on their material possessions, we can clearly see that the spiritual integrity of their relationships as a family is not founded in having open and honest dialogue.

I don’t know about you, but I would prefer honesty over luxury any day. Unfortunately, in this day and age we are constantly force fed this type of subtle propaganda to no end.

The sad truth is that this commercial is a success simply due to the fact that so many people within a family unit can relate to something as subtle as making a several hundred dollar purchase in secret while knowing that every financial decision can and does affect the entire family unit.

In short, if you are a covetous  person who prefers the pursuit of self interest over the values of honesty within your family unit, then this car insurance is for you.

But… who are we kidding. I am clearly ignorant, and I am just overthinking things. What’s the harm in shoving this down millions of people’s throats on constant repeat?

Probably nothing.

Space, the final frontier of discrepancies

I am no scientist, nor do I claim to have any bit a smarts in me wee-pea-brain. But, I can’t help but look at the following images and ask myself if NASA seems to have some continuity issues here. Observationally speaking, the images below don’t really match up.

space1.png

I just can’t help but notice the dissimilarities here. Look at how much closer those rings seem to have gotten while also becoming more in tune with how they would act if gravitational attraction on a cosmic scale were an actual factor. What I mean by that is this… the photo on the left seems to suggest that the rings are somehow offset from the sphere, and as a result somehow defy the way that gravity is supposed to act in the vacuum of space.

Come to think of it, I have looked at Saturn a few times in my life through a telescope. And not once have I ever observed its rings in a geometrical formation around the sphere such as the 2016 NASA photo seems to suggest. No, instead I have always observed it to be much like what we see in the image on the left (offset; defying the centrifugal momentum gravity would place on the rings). Why is it that this inconsistency exists? Why is it that what NASA shows us regarding this celestial body does not match what we can actually observe on our own when looking through a telescope? Apparently, the more expensive your telescope, the more it effects where the rings are positioned in relation to Saturn as a sphere.

Seems logical…

But it doesn’t stop there. If you go back and look at any of the images from 1960 and compare them to today’s NASA images, there are a lot of things that don’t seem to line up. Don’t get me wrong, I understand that the “quality” of a photo changes the way that the image will appear. I understand how focus works. I’ve used a camera. That will however… not change the shape or features of the image to the degree that we see here.

space2.png

Apparently, when you increase the resolution of an image the shape of that image and its features also change. I didn’t know that was how it worked. How ignorant of me. Speaking of shapes… the science people of today seem to suggest that the earth isn’t actually round at all. None of the planets are, apparently. Nope… they are oblate. And according to good ol’ Neil, the earth is pear shaped, because that makes sense.

If that is true, then why are all of the NASA images of any planet showing us something perfectly round? As you can see in the photo on the left of Jupiter, it doesn’t appear to be a perfect circle (which goes along with what scientists tell us about the shape of the earth and other heavenly bodies today). Why then are all of the photos of every planet including the earth perfectly spherical in shape today? They are either round or they aren’t. They can’t be both. Someone needs to get with Neil and Bill to clear all of that up.

Anyway, I feel like this rant has run its course. I just don’t feel that the drastic differences we see in the above images should exist over such a short amount of time. Something has got to give. Either the images from the 60’s were forged… or the images from today are forged. And since I can look through a telescope on my own and see roughly the same thing that was shown in the 60’s, I am inclined to agree with them. On the other hand, I can drop today’s NASA images into Photoshop and by changing the opacity to show where most NASA “photos” have been cropped, edited, or cloned in some way (making them no longer a photo, but a composite – which is a fancy way of saying, drawing). With that, I am more inclined to believe that the images provided to use today are the ones that are fake.

Having said that, here you go… rant actually over. Space is fake.

Someone explain these inconsistencies, please.

And if your attempt of an explanation is simply Googling one phrase, clicking the first video you find, and sending it to me… nice try, but no thanks. If you actually started looking closer at this stuff, you would be asking these types of questions, too.

But who are we kidding… right? I am ignorant.