Subtle signs that hint to the truth

I have a lot of friends both Christian and non-Christian alike that love NASA. They love science and space exploration. They love learning about black holes, gas giants, and all the cool things NASA constantly puts out. I used to be like that too. But, the one thing that these two groups of people will disagree on is creation. The idea of God creating all things against the idea that it all started from nothing is a big debate. And today, many Christians side with the nothingness theory as if it were proven true, but still insist that God inspired the nothingness to create everything regardless of the fact that this concept goes against scripture.

And the pioneer of these epic discoveries just so happens to have no agenda at all. NASA is neither secular or Christian. Their agenda is clearly just one of science and the pursuit of knowledge… nothing more. Nothing less. That is one thing that both sides of the NASA fandom will agree on. NASA doesn’t have an agenda toward or against spiritual matters.

I am sorry, but I disagree with that entirely.

If they are known for being so none bias, then why is every single mission that they do related to pagan gods, Gnosticism, the occult, or outright luciferian concepts? And as of yesterday, we have yet again another example of this very thing to pile atop the countless other examples.

Meet Lucy, the mission that is apparently sending us to the Trojan Asteroids of Jupiter.


Let’s totally set aside the fact that once again we are presented with nothing more than fake CGI junk rather than something tangible and real. Let’s stop and take a look the subliminal meanings behind this mission. And, in turn consider how NASA truly is none bias… or not.

The first thing to consider is the destination. We are sending a probe to a cluster of rocks known as Trojans. A Trojan by definition is a tool used to mislead large groups of people against the devices true intent. Secondly, we should stop and look at how and why the project was given its name; Lucy.

The name Lucy is derived from a Latin word, Lucius, meaning light. This explains why Satan is also known as Lucifer… also meaning light. And since the promises of Satan were transcendence and illumination, it is no wonder the movie Lucy was given such a name when evaluating what it was about (transcendence).


This patch symbolizes exactly the stance that NASA has on spiritual matters. With that in mind, I do not understand how so many Christians can so quickly rally behind this organization. Here, in this patch we have Lucy, the monkey skeleton… which stand on the bases of the evolution of mankind from primates to humans. Secondly, we have the rocks next to the probe. When compared to the ape bones to the probe we can see that it implies our evolutionary transcendence via the promises of Lucifer through knowledge and technology… who just so happens to hold the exact same meaning in his name as the word Lucy on the patch.

To make things even more interesting, the name of this NASA probe project was derived from the Beatles and a song called “Lucy in the sky with diamonds“. I could honestly rant on this fact forever. With that in mind I will simply point out that the album that this song appears on is heavily tied to LSD and Alice in Wonderland… which implies higher states of copiousness (Lucy being a great title since it means what it means).  Enough said.

So… why the diamond? Could it possibly be because it ties so well with the rest of the theme? I bet that could be the case. The diamond shape symbolizes ascension, clarity, and wisdom in many cultures.

With that said, here we have NASA propagating evolution to the masses, honoring Lucifer for his light of promising ascension, clarity, and wisdom through a band that is heavily associated with the occult. While at the same time admitting to your face that it is nothing more than a Trojan meant to mislead the masses, which is exactly what it is doing.

You want to keep believing in their fake CGI nonsense, you go right ahead.

As for myself, I will stick with the scriptures and the true scientific method. I don’t know. I guess I’m just ignorant, but a $19 billion dollar budget doesn’t automatically make your NASA cartoon truth. It is still just a cartoon.

And at the end of the day, I don’t care what you believe in… one thing is clear. NASA does promote a spiritual agenda weather you admit it or not. Just go back and look at the names of all their past missions.

There is a point when you could consider it all to be coincidence. But, let’s face it. We have been beyond that point for quite some time now.

Proof that this is all one big Joke @NASA

When you listen to this guy in the video, please note what he is talking about. According to NASA they can use a smart-phone on the ground to control an orbital object on the ISS via Wi-Fi.


You have got to be freaking kidding me. How in the world are people buying into this nonsense?

Please note that, according to NASA, the ISS is nearly 200 miles away traveling at almost 50 miles a second, 18,000 miles per hour, orbiting every 2 hours. How in the ever loving truth are we sending a WiFi signal 200 miles away, let alone not losing signal the moment it gets there? Every thirty minutes or so the ISS would be on the back side of the earth opposite of ground control. I had to look into the technology for myself. And lo-and-behold, NASA took it down.

I wonder why. Maybe, because… for once they realize they are claiming something absolutely absurd.


What the heck, people… What the heck. This is so ridiculous.

11 second delays and lies @NASA

So, here is the thing. I just have one question about the most recent, first ever, 4k live stream interview with NASA from the ISS.

At exactly 6 minutes and 5 seconds in the interview begins (you can just jump to that section on the video) with the ISS from the earth with a supposed 11 second delay. Makes sense considering the fact that they are streaming live from nearly 260 miles high up in the exosphere, right? At exactly 6 minutes and 31 seconds into the video he announces the 11 second delay.

My question is this; where do they get this 11 seconds?

It is absolutely absurd for a few reasons. One good reason is that if you go back and watch any or all interviews from the ground with the ISS, some videos have only like a 2 to 3 second delay. Not 11 seconds.

But the thing to really consider is this; at exactly 6 minutes and 49 seconds into this video, the crowd on earth gasps, and we see an instant reaction by astroNOT, Jack Fischer to the crowd.

How is that possible with an 11 second delay???

With that said, beyond the point of about 7 minutes into the video, you will have seen all there is to see. Because, let’s face it… the truth is hidden in plain sight.

But wait, there’s more.

If the 11 second delay, or any delay for that matter, is real… then how in the ever loving truth is this following video even possible? Any true musician will tell you it is absolutely impossible to do this with even a fraction of a delay, let alone 11 seconds.

Absolutely absurd.

I think the thing to point out here other than the obvious is the first set of lyrics in the song.

On solid fuel and wires….

You got that part right, NASA. Wires… is exactly how it’s done. Wires and slight of hand.

So, here is the thing.

Either NASA is lying about the 11 second delay to make the event of live streaming seem more amazing by emphasizing how far away they are from earth (which makes them a liar). Or, the other option is a) they were on the ground while they did the little music number and pretended to be in space (which makes them a liar) or, b) they aren’t in the exosphere at all and have been on earth the entire time (which also makes them a liar). And considering the fact that Jack Fischer instantly reacted to the crowd without a delay in the first video, I am more inclined to believe the later… because no mater how you look at it, they are lying.

Just think of it like this; a lot of people will say… but I have seen the ISS with my own eyes. It’s up there.

Next time you see a plane in the air, stop and consider how small it is at only a few miles up. If you think you are able to see that same plane with the naked eye at nearly 260 miles, you aren’t actually thinking.

But hey, don’t take my word for it. Just ask NASA… because, who are we kidding. They don’t lie. Just ask Jack Fischer’s reaction in the first video.

How ignorant of me. I guess I’ll be on my way now.

666 Days in Sapce and an Epic Red Dragon? @NASA

I am already against NASA and am one of the few that think they are 100% fake. No moon landing. No Mars missions. No manmade objects in deep space beyond the exosphere. Yes, satellites are real… but not in deep space as we are told, but rather helium restricted orbital objects no higher than the stratosphere. Yes, I sound crazy, but what I am about to point out is even crazier.

So… what happened today that has me posting about NASA and the number 666, let alone an Epic Red  Dragon?


Seriously, you couldn’t make this stuff up if you wanted to. Today, live in a whopping 4k high definition feed provided to us from NASA, a few things happened. One, astronaut Peggy Whitson was congratulated on her achievement of being in space the longest, which when she lands in September, will put her at having been in space exactly 666 days.

How ironic is that, right? Well, it gets better. You see, right before congratulating her of this great accomplishment something else happened on the live feed as well. For starters, lets totally set aside the fact that this event wasn’t just brought to you by NASA. No, it was brought to you by Hollywood, too! The opening speech was about how the efforts of this event takes “film makers“, and “story tellers” to come to life. Sure does, NASA… sure does.


Aside from the obvious 666 days in space being a very symbolic and obviously intentional number, what about this epic red dragon?

Well, it just so happens that they held a short “ceremony” (I didn’t call it that, they did) where they handed of a camera to the product manager for the camera company. The camera just happens to be named Epic Red Dragon. And what better way to congradulate an astronaut on her accomplishments of being the first to be in space for 666 days, than to have a ceremonial passing off of the Epic Red Dragon, right?


Seems legit.

As I said you can’t make this stuff up if you wanted to. As a matter of fact, I recall seeing a passage or two in my bible about something like that. You know, dragons and numbers or what have you.

And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.Revelation 12:3 KJV

And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? – Revelation 13:4 KJV

Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.Revelation 13:18

So, in short, we have an Epic Red Dragon giving power to the beast. And the number of this beast’s name is 666. And NASA, today, had a ceremonial passing of a great dragon while applauding the number 666. Do I think that this is some type of prophecy being fulfilled? No, but I will say… the elite like symbolism, ritual, and mockery. You can’t deny that when seeing what happened today.

Now, if we couple that together with the fact that NASA apparently outsources to Hollywood now… you have to ask yourself… coincidence?

NASA is fake and we are reaching a time in history when these types of “coincidences” are no longer obscured, but rather put in plain sight for all to see.  And the sad thing is… even with it out in the open like this many will still not have an ear to hear, as Christ would say.

I can’t wait to see what they come up with next.

But who am I kidding. I am clearly over thinking things. How ignorant of me.

NASA and the expanse and compression of metals

A few weeks ago I posted a blog asking one simple question ~ how can the ISS exist in the Exosphere if that part of the atmosphere is said to reach temperatures of 3000 degrees while the exterior of the ISS is made of a material that has a melting point of only 1200 degrees. I went further in that blog post to mention that the Exosphere is below zero on the dark side of the earth and 3000 degrees on the sun side. With that in mind I also asked how the ISS could withstand the constant fluctuation of those drastic temperatures every 12 hours as the earth rotates on its axis.

What I mean by that is this ~ metal is known to expand when it is heated and becomes dense when cooled. The constant fluctuation from hot to cold will eventually compromise molecular cohesion of the metals and the integrity thereof.

With this being mentioned, I would like to clarify that I was actually wrong in my assertion that the ISS would experience this fluctuation ONLY once every 12 hours.


Here are the facts: The current altitude for the ISS orbit is somewhere around 250 nautical miles above the surface of the earth. Given that altitude, the period, or time for one orbit is approximately 90 minutes. The ISS is going so fast that It makes an entire 360 degree rotational orbit in just over one hour. With a 90 minute orbit and a 24 hour day, the ISS will circle the Earth 16 times a day. That means 16 sunrises and 16 sunsets each and every orbital day for the last 10 years of said orbit.

Think about that for a minute.


You are telling me that the ISS cools in a nearly zero degree frame of reference and then begins to rise in nearly 3000 degree temperatures every 90 minutes and the constant fluctuating pressures of contraction generated by the heating and cooling of the component metals hasn’t caused the ISS to completely fall apart in orbit in 10 years as a result of metabolic destabilization?

Let’s set aside the idea that the ISS hasn’t completely melted (for argument’s sake even though it would under real world circumstance). Let’s assume for a moment that aluminum could withstand 3000 degrees. That wouldn’t change the fact that those materials would be under constant strain of depression and expanse every hour as the ISS orbited the earth reaching a total of 16 sunrises and 16 sunsets every 24 hours.

If it really is where they say, going as fast as they say, under the temperatures that they say, made of the materials that they say, (forgetting the fact that it would melt) how has it not fallen apart yet when you consider the physical properties of known metals here on earth and their metabolic reaction to the constant heating and cooling of the surrounding environment?

Apparently, the vacuum of space tells metal to act however it would like so long as it assimilates to NASA despite its apparent contradiction of the natural laws of physics and chemistry.

But what do I know, right? I’m just ignorant.

Final Note: So, what is the point of touching up on this topic if I have already posted about it in the past? The point is this; the fluctuations that I mentioned in my previous post are much more frequent than previously implied by an additional 15 times per day. Since when did science fiction become science fact?

The Copernican Principle Blunder strikes again

Well, I suppose it is time for me to ask a new question. This one is about gravity. But, before I get into it, let us first start by covering the basics of gravity as well as the basics for angular momentum. But first, let’s put on our thinking caps.


So… here we go.

The Gravitational Constant: The Gravitational Constant has a value of 6.67384×10^-11 m^3 kg^-1 s^-2. Now, this possibly looks a bit messy but it basically means that gravity has a “set strength“. A strength that works in 3-dimensional space, is an accelerating force and is determined by mass.

With that said, angular momentum is the quantity of rotation of a body, which is the product of its moment of inertia and its angular velocity. Essentially, the faster an object or body rotates, the more velocity it will generate. In short… faster equals more.


Now that we have established those two principles (gravity has a constant, and momentum generates more velocity the faster it goes), here is something to consider.

An object on the Earth’s equator travels once around the Earth’s circumference before making a 360 degree cycle. This is about 24,901 miles (40,075 kilometres) per day. To calculate speed, Mr Kadish divided that distance by 23hr, 56m, 4s to reach the figure of 1,040 mph. This means that at the equator the earth is spinning at more than one thousand miles per hour.

Now, the cool thing to consider about this fact is simply this; any object on the earth farther away from the equator (like New York or Australia for example) are actually traveling much slower since they do not need to cover nearly as much space within that 360 degree rotation as the equator does to makes its 360 degree round trip at such a drastic speed. The momentum at the equator is much greater than that of the North and South Poles, thus generation the most velocity at the equator.

This is where angular momentum comes in.


When you consider the level of force generated by the momentum of a ball traveling at a speed at let’s say, one thousand miles per hour, any water on the surface of that ball would be forced toward the equator of rotation as a result of angular momentum.

With that said here is the question; if the earth is spinning as fast as we are told, what keeps the water on Earth’s surface from gathering together at the equator as a result of angular momentum?

The answer that I have been given is simply – gravity.

But here is why I have a problem with that answer. You are telling me that the gravitational constant is SO GREAT that it can force the seas to stay fixed while not being drawn by the angular momentum of 1,040 miles per hour of velocity. And yet, something as delicate as a butterfly’s wings do not instantly collapse under that very same gravitational constant?

The Copernican Principle is a joke.

Psalms 93:1 – The Lord reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the Lord is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved.