Question of the day…
If space is real, then why are all of the top stories presented to us in illustration form? Could it be… dare I say… fake?
Question of the day…
If space is real, then why are all of the top stories presented to us in illustration form? Could it be… dare I say… fake?
If you read my blog at all you already know that I present a lot of my posts geared toward the fact that I think that NASA and SPACEX are totally bogus. Not only this, but I also tend to occasionally take the time to show the correlation of these types of companies with end times events and scripture. With that said, I can’t believe I didn’t see this one until now.
Just last week on September 17th, SpaceX “released the dragon” so to speak. Seriously, you couldn’t make this junk up if you wanted to. The following video is a time lapse releasing of a capsule that is ironically named “Dragon“.
The caption for the video literally reads: Release the Dragon.
Some of you might be wondering why this even matters. And I can understand that. I just find it hilariously odd that the timing happened to be when it was (Toward the end of September).
2 Thessalonians 2:3 – Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition.
2 Thessalonians 2:6-7 – And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
You see, there is this character in the bible known as the dragon who is being restrained. Eventually the restrainer will be removed and God will allow the dragon to be released onto the world to rule for a short time. And here we are on September 17th (literally the Sunday before the great wonder in heaven was fulfilled on September 21st-23rd) with a globalized alliance of different space agencies essentially chanting the phrase “release the dragon“.
Revelation 12:3-9 – And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads. And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born. And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne. And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
The timing for this type of stuff just couldn’t be any more blatantly ridiculous. But then again, I am probably just an ignorant Christian that needs to realize that space is real and the companies in charge of exploring it have never once imposed any sort of religious rituals into their proceedings or exploration.
You know, like that one time an Epic Red dragon camera was handed out while honoring an astronaut on achieving 666 days in space (you know, because that was also a coincidence).
So, Elon Musk is making some big proposals as seen in the above video. Rather than point out the simple fact that none of this was actual footage, but instead mere CGI nonsense… I want to make a proposal of my own.
Rather than insist that you can accomplish such a lofty dream within the next 6 years, why not prove that you can by demonstrating your capabilities somewhere closer to home? Show me that this lofty dream about Mars is truly possible by accomplishing it on the moon first. The funny thing is, they won’t.
Because, they can’t.
Elon Musk and SpaceX have yet to prove they can do something small. So, why then is the world drooling in awe at their lofty dreams? Build a moon base and prove that is it possible to sustain life outside of earth… and then we will talk.
But instead of proving it to be possible we will just skip that part and believe on blind faith that it is possible simply because a man who claims to be wise told us so.
Give me a break, people. Nothing that SpaceX has produces is real. I have yet to watch a single launch/landing that didn’t cut to CGI or change camera just at the right moment resulting in absolutely zero uninterrupted shots of a successful landing.
Things like that are generally called misdirection in the world of magic.
And that’s all this is… magical hopes provides by magical people that do nothing true in the real world.
If this junk is possible, prove it first by doing something more realistic like a base on the moon. Why on earth would we skip such a step unless this is nothing more than lofty misdirection in the first place?
Lastly, I would like to point out that SpaceX is claiming that they will accomplish this first phases of this task within the next 6 years. I do not at all find this to be coincidental when you consider the current signs of the times. If you don’t know what I am talking about, then go read the last post I did about the stars.
Those that are in control of the delusion are running out of time and they realize that…. which is why the claims are becoming big and bolder with tighter deadlines.
Rant over. Space is fake.
I don’t know why, but even still… eleven days after the September 23rd sign in the sky that was foretold in Revelation has come and gone, I am still finding myself glued to it wanting to know more. To me this sign is significant. And I think most Christians that realize that this sign has recently fulfilled the first two verses of Revelation 12 will also agree with that statement. It however seems to me that most Christians have stepped away from it. September 23rd has come and gone and most everyone is over it.
“Let’s move on to something,” they say.
For some reason I just haven’t been able to do that. There were way too many things lining up historically both on the world stage and on the Jewish calendar for this to not be something to glaze over and forget about so quickly.
With that, I kept looking… and realized something. While most everyone will agree that the first two verses of Revelation have been fulfilled, they forget to realize that there are other things associated with this sign in the heavens in the following verses. Therefore, I refuse to give up and have continued to watch.
Revelation 12:1-3 – And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered (this is the part that has officially been fulfilled). And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads (this part needs a little more attention).
Serpens, the snake at the feet of the woman has a head that is made up of seven stars (or, rather… seven heads). Then right above this snake’s head is the Corona, or crown (which is also a constellation made up of exactly 7 stars).
Another way of saying seven crowns perhaps?
But that isn’t what really caught my eye. What really sparked my interest last night was the fact that I hadn’t seen it before. Saturn is at the knee of the man waging war with the snake in heaven.
Revelation 12:4 – And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
Did you know that Saturn is actually considered a god that devours man children as soon as they are born?
With that said, I had to go see if anyone else had noticed this. Hopefully someone else had shed some light on this already. And sure enough, they had. I found the following video.
There is just too much going on with this sign for it to so quickly be overlooked by the vast majority of Christians. We are living in a time when prophecy is being fulfilled before our very eyes. How are we so quick to walk away from something this big and go back to our daily lives like this isn’t currently unfolding above us? I just don’t understand it.
Another thing that I have noticed is that October 13th is the day that Jupiter officially leaves the relative safety of Virgo (its mother), meaning that it is considered vulnerable for the first time. I find it rather coincidental that this date occurs in conjunction with the Jewish celebration known as Simchat Torah.
Why is this significant?
Well, October 13th just so happens to be the day known to the Jews as the “Eighth Day“… or the day of completion, because that is the day that they finish the yearly reading of the Old Testament and officially bring in the new year of reading.
John 19:30 – When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.
One, you can roll your eyes at the fact that I am still excited about this sign. Or two, you can admit to yourself that this thing is huge and that the honest likelihood that all of this would line up perfectly (in the stars, Jewish calendar, historically, and more…) is more than mere coincidence.
This string of events reminds me of the story of the 12 virgins found in Mathew 25:1-13. I recommend you go give it a read (to me it represents the delay we are currently seeing).
Time is short. The day of the Lord is at hand. But, who are we kidding… right? I clearly am just an ignorant Christian.
So, today’s thought isn’t really anything new for the stuff you might see me post on this site. It is instead a series of unknown presuppositions that somehow ridiculously line up with one another, creating what I like to call “irony at its finest“.
I recently wrote a blog post about NASA and how they are founded in Pantheistic Gnostic concepts that idolize a plethora of different Greek gods. I also took the time to point out what NASA actually means in Hebrew (deceiver).
When you consider the fact that NASA is founded in the occult teachings of these types of Greek gods, I find it rather peculiar that Jack Parsons, one of the founding members of NASA, was a devotee of the one and only Aleister Crowley. This man was a Satanist through and through and actually referred to himself as the beast.
With that in mind, it is not at all surprising to find things like the fact that Peggy Whitson is about to break the record for longest days in space for any astronaut. When she comes back from space in just a few weeks her record will have reached exactly 666 days in space. On the same day that they congratulated her for this upcoming accomplishment they handed out an award called the “Epic Red Dragon“. But, you can just got back and read that blog post to get all of that info if you want.
With those things in mind, do I really need to get into the details of how ironic it is to find the number 666 literally ingrained into where we are told we live? Because, at the end of the day… the people that are presenting the absolute most evidence to back the Copernican Principle of Heliocentric Cosmological Evolution would have to be NASA.
With that said, we are told that the earth is flying around the sun at 18.5 miles per second. This just so happens to come out to 66,600 miles per hour.
We are also told that the earth is tilted at a 23.4 degree access off of 90. This would in turn mean that the opposing tilt of the earth is equal to 66.6 degrees.
But it doesn’t stop there. We are also told that the radius of the earth is exactly 0.666 feet per mile squared. By using this earth curvature calculator you can determine how much curvature exists not only against distance, but against height as well. With that, I have set the curvature to read from ground level with a total distance of one mile.
So, totally setting aside the fact that all of this seems just a little bit too coincidental, when exactly did we start calling both the seas and the dry land the same thing?
Genesis 1:10 – And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
God didn’t name both the seas and dry land Earth. At least that’s how I am reading it. The dry land had a name… and the water had a name. With that, when did we start calling both the dry land and the oceans the same name?
If you wan’t to believe in the Copernican Principle which is the foundation of the heliocentric big bang cosmological evolutionary theory, you go right ahead. More power to ya. But, honestly… something seems a little fishy to me.
But, what do i know right? I’m just ignorant.
But seriously though, if you ever just wanted to see how much of an idiot I really am, just scroll through the science page on my site. You will learn real quick how ignorant I really am.
I am no scientist, nor do I claim to have any bit a smarts in me wee-pea-brain. But, I can’t help but look at the following images and ask myself if NASA seems to have some continuity issues here. Observationally speaking, the images below don’t really match up.
I just can’t help but notice the dissimilarities here. Look at how much closer those rings seem to have gotten while also becoming more in tune with how they would act if gravitational attraction on a cosmic scale were an actual factor. What I mean by that is this… the photo on the left seems to suggest that the rings are somehow offset from the sphere, and as a result somehow defy the way that gravity is supposed to act in the vacuum of space.
Come to think of it, I have looked at Saturn a few times in my life through a telescope. And not once have I ever observed its rings in a geometrical formation around the sphere such as the 2016 NASA photo seems to suggest. No, instead I have always observed it to be much like what we see in the image on the left (offset; defying the centrifugal momentum gravity would place on the rings). Why is it that this inconsistency exists? Why is it that what NASA shows us regarding this celestial body does not match what we can actually observe on our own when looking through a telescope? Apparently, the more expensive your telescope, the more it effects where the rings are positioned in relation to Saturn as a sphere.
But it doesn’t stop there. If you go back and look at any of the images from 1960 and compare them to today’s NASA images, there are a lot of things that don’t seem to line up. Don’t get me wrong, I understand that the “quality” of a photo changes the way that the image will appear. I understand how focus works. I’ve used a camera. That will however… not change the shape or features of the image to the degree that we see here.
Apparently, when you increase the resolution of an image the shape of that image and its features also change. I didn’t know that was how it worked. How ignorant of me. Speaking of shapes… the science people of today seem to suggest that the earth isn’t actually round at all. None of the planets are, apparently. Nope… they are oblate. And according to good ol’ Neil, the earth is pear shaped, because that makes sense.
If that is true, then why are all of the NASA images of any planet showing us something perfectly round? As you can see in the photo on the left of Jupiter, it doesn’t appear to be a perfect circle (which goes along with what scientists tell us about the shape of the earth and other heavenly bodies today). Why then are all of the photos of every planet including the earth perfectly spherical in shape today? They are either round or they aren’t. They can’t be both. Someone needs to get with Neil and Bill to clear all of that up.
Anyway, I feel like this rant has run its course. I just don’t feel that the drastic differences we see in the above images should exist over such a short amount of time. Something has got to give. Either the images from the 60’s were forged… or the images from today are forged. And since I can look through a telescope on my own and see roughly the same thing that was shown in the 60’s, I am inclined to agree with them. On the other hand, I can drop today’s NASA images into Photoshop and by changing the opacity to show where most NASA “photos” have been cropped, edited, or cloned in some way (making them no longer a photo, but a composite – which is a fancy way of saying, drawing). With that, I am more inclined to believe that the images provided to use today are the ones that are fake.
Having said that, here you go… rant actually over. Space is fake.
Someone explain these inconsistencies, please.
And if your attempt of an explanation is simply Googling one phrase, clicking the first video you find, and sending it to me… nice try, but no thanks. If you actually started looking closer at this stuff, you would be asking these types of questions, too.
But who are we kidding… right? I am ignorant.