OSIRIS-REx camera and a gorgeous photo

First off, the article is titled OSIRIS-REx tested its cameras by taking a gorgeous photo of its home planet. So, the craft took a photograph… I think. Or wait, an “image“. Which is it? The powers that be either took a photo or it is what NASA and its sister companies love to call “a composite“.

Acording to the article, OSIRIS-REx launched in September 2016, using Earth as a slingshot the following year for help redirecting its path to Bennu. During the maneuver, it turned its mid-range scientific camera MapCam towards the Earth, snapping some pics of our planet in space.


But, rather than point out the obvious fact that the above photos are in all actuality, not photos at all, I want to address something else that I have addressed in the past. But first, I find it ironic that both NASA, its sister companies, and those who post on their content are double tongued. Either these “images” are actual photos or they aren’t. It’s that simple.

The above image is a composite of photographs captured on October 2, 2017. The images were taken using three color filters, then the contrast on the moon was stretched to make it brighter and more visible. 

In short, we are told “photograph” while they simultaneously imply tampering to a large degree. By adjusting the exposure on the “photo“, you can see the light directive given to the earthen object. This is unnatural as we all know that light bends toward the observer in some cases as well as spreading outward the longer the distace (in this case we are led to believe the observer is a man made object 3,180,000 miles from home with the ability to be controlled and manipulated wireless from that great of a distance with nothing but the empty vacuum of space as its medium for transiting a signal).

One, why doesn’t the light bend toward the camera? Two, if it is multiple images overlaying one another, how are the clouds on earth from that great of a distance so clearly defined? Three, what in the world are the variations of black-static-grey strips if not a tacky slack photoshop job?


Now, with all of that aside I want to point out the real reason why I wanted to address this subject specifically. OSIRIS-Rex means – Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, and Security-Regolith Explorer. In short, I find it funny that the first word is “origins” explorer.

With that, we are going to leave it to NASA (Hebrew meaning – deceiver) with finding our origins with the help of Osiris as he flies through space to reach Bennu, the bird.

Osiris is the Egyptian Lord of the Underworld and Judge of the Dead, brother-husband to Isis, and one of the most important gods of ancient Egypt. The name `Osiris‘ is the Latinized form of the Egyptian Usir which is interpreted as ‘powerful’ or ‘mighty‘.

Bennu on the other hand was a self-created being said to have played a role in the creation of the world. It was said to be the ba of Ra and enabled the creative actions of Atum. It was said to have flown over the waters of Nun that existed before creation, landing on a rock and issuing a call that determined the nature of creation.


But hey… science is clearly unbiased when it comes to religious or spiritual connotations… right?

Genesis 1: 1-2In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

Don’t be fooled. Space isn’t a series of photos. It is a series of artists using programs like photoshop to push their agenda (and in this case it happens to be that of Pagan worship).

2 Timothy 4:4And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

If you want to believe in their nonsensical photoshop and the promotion of Pegan gods, you go right ahead.

Space is fake.


Science has no foundation in religion, I promise

Post - April 2013 (3)

As usual, let us totally forget the fact that this is an artist illustration and move on.

On one hand we have people like this guy telling us that this rock careening through the vacuum of space is 3 miles wide while at the same time having a header that claims it is only 1 mile wide (But, that is beside the point). Or, what about the fact that… as usual, science (which is supposedly not rooted in religion) has chosen to go with a Greek mythology god when naming this thing.

3200 Phaethon, provisional designation 1983 TB, is an Apollo asteroid with an unusual orbit that brings it closer to the Sun than any other named asteroid. For this reason, it was named after the Greek myth of Phaëton, son of the sun god Helios.


I am sorry, but there comes a point when we need to realize the truth. As much as modern men want us to believe that science separates itself from religion, this is a lie. Scientism is the new one world religion that has fooled everyone into thinking that the desire for knowledge is in fact not the root of Satan’s promise to Adam and Eve in the garden in the first place.

The funny thing about it today is the fact that it is put right in your face with the way that these “objects” are being named.

Jude 1:13 – Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.

But hey… what do I know, right? I am clearly just ignorant.

I supposed we should talk elephants


This September 23rd sign has gotten a lot of attention from both the Christian and non-Christian world in the last few weeks (especially the last few days). You have people suggesting that the September 23rd sign marked the beginning of the end of the world. And some have even claimed that it would end without question, but it didn’t. As a result, many people are now looking at the Christians as if it were, as a group, totally ignorant (just another silly Y2K scare for nothing). After all, it’s the 24th and we are all still here… right?


Before people get up in arms about this sign I want to simply point out a few things.

One, it happened during the Feast of Trumpets for crying out loud. Two, the bible said it would happen, and it did. Three, although I was excited about the potential for this being a rapture date but find myself still here, I personally believe that this sign was a prophetic nod to the fact that the rapture and tribulation are right around the corner. And in turn, that this current generation is the generation that will see the last days.

Why do I say this?

In Revelation 12 we find a woman giving birth to a man-child that is “caught up” to heaven. This same Hebrew word “ērpasthē“, which means caught up is the same word used in 1 Thessalonians 4:17, talking of those who are still alive that are “caught up” in the rapture.


Another thing to consider is the fact that Jupiter still has not yet left the inside of Virgo. Therefore, how is the dragon going to attempt to eat the child if it is still within the safety zone of its mother? I am curious to see what events unfold across the world as Jupiter leaves the safety zone of Virgo, and in turn allowing the child to be taken up.

Now, does this mean that the moment Jupiter leaves the inner region of Virgo the rapture will instantly happen? No, I don’t think so. However, I will gladly suggest that this symbolizes the final sign of fulfillment needing to occur before the rapture can take place (which is why I think the Hebrew word ērpasthē was used in coloration with this sign).

Luke 21:25 says that there would be signs in the sun moon and stars and that after this there would be great distress both in the heavens and on the earth. With that in mind, I do not think it is a coincidence that this sign occurred when it did. Just look at the political world stage today, both for Israel and the world over. Things are ramping up.

Not only does this sign prove the bible to be the truth, but its timing should be a warming to those that think things will get better before they get worse.

But, what do I know right? I clearly am just ignorant.

Jews didn’t just recently start gaining full access Temple mount or anything.

What do I know, right?

Climate change… yeah, that’s it.

Revelation 9:3And there came out of the smoke locusts upon the earth: and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power.

August 31st –  Trinidad

September 9th – Russia

September 12th – Dagestan

September 11th – China

Although I have personal reason to believe that the Revelation 9 reference to locusts is actually a result of the bottomless pit being opened during the tribulation period, I will say this. When you look at all that is currently happening (earthquakes in diverse places, devastating whirlwinds, one third of North America currently on fire, floods, and more…), I can’t help but see this type of thing as a precursor to what is to come shortly.

But, who are we kidding, right? I am ignorant. It’s all probably just climate change.

NASA rant of the day. So many sixes my head hurts

So, today’s thought isn’t really anything new for the stuff you might see me post on this site. It is instead a series of unknown presuppositions that somehow ridiculously line up with one another, creating what I like to call “irony at its finest“.

I recently wrote a blog post about NASA and how they are founded in Pantheistic Gnostic concepts that idolize a plethora of different Greek gods. I also took the time to point out what NASA actually means in Hebrew (deceiver).


When you consider the fact that NASA is founded in the occult teachings of these types of Greek gods, I find it rather peculiar that Jack Parsons, one of the founding members of NASA, was a devotee of the one and only Aleister Crowley. This man was a Satanist through and through and actually referred to himself as the beast.

With that in mind, it is not at all surprising to find things like the fact that Peggy Whitson is about to break the record for longest days in space for any astronaut. When she comes back from space in just a few weeks her record will have reached exactly 666 days in space.  On the same day that they congratulated her for this upcoming accomplishment they handed out an award called the “Epic Red Dragon“. But, you can just got back and read that blog post to get all of that info if you want.


With those things in mind, do I really need to get into the details of how ironic it is to find the number 666 literally ingrained into where we are told we live? Because, at the end of the day… the people that are presenting the absolute most evidence to back the Copernican Principle of Heliocentric Cosmological Evolution would have to be NASA.

With that said, we are told that the earth is flying around the sun at 18.5 miles per second. This just so happens to come out to 66,600 miles per hour.


We are also told that the earth is tilted at a 23.4 degree access off of 90. This would in turn mean that the opposing tilt of the earth is equal to 66.6 degrees.


But it doesn’t stop there. We are also told that the radius of the earth is exactly 0.666 feet per mile squared. By using this earth curvature calculator you can determine how much curvature exists not only against distance, but against height as well. With that, I have set the curvature to read from ground level with a total distance of one mile.


So, totally setting aside the fact that all of this seems just a little bit too coincidental, when exactly did we start calling both the seas and the dry land the same thing?

Genesis 1:10And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.

God didn’t name both the seas and dry land Earth. At least that’s how I am reading it. The dry land had a name… and the water had a name. With that, when did we start calling both the dry land and the oceans the same name?

If you wan’t to believe in the Copernican Principle which is the foundation of the heliocentric big bang cosmological evolutionary theory, you go right ahead. More power to ya. But, honestly… something seems a little fishy to me.

But, what do i know right? I’m just ignorant.

But seriously though, if you ever just wanted to see how much of an idiot I really am, just scroll through the science page on my site. You will learn real quick how ignorant I really am.

I have an honest question about Faith and Science

I just wanted to take a moment to ask a genuine question.

As a Christian I have found that pretty much most, if not all, Christians will agree that the bible is the truth. These same bible believing Christians will also agree with one another regarding the creation account (to an extent… which is what brings up my question).

What I mean by that is this.

Most Bible believing Christians will agree that God created man, placing him in a real garden. He then put man to sleep so as to take a rib to create woman. Eventually, they sinned against God and were kicked out of the garden. With that, the concept of evolution is thrown out the window. Most Christians that I meet will instantly agree that Darwin, the Geologic column, and the theory of evolution are totally bogus. This theory defy the bible and the creation account (no question about it). When we look deep enough at evolution one can quickly see the lies.

For example, everyone has heard of the missing link. If we came from primates, then where is the link between us and them? But it doesn’t stop there. If a rock turned into a fish, and a fish turned into a lizard, then show me a missing link there. If a lizard turned into a cat, show me the missing link there. And honestly, you can’t (the reason why is due to the fact that there is a missing link between every kind of species… which is why evolution is still just a theory in the eyes of most Christians).

And since evolution is piggybacking on the geologic column, so many Christians are quick to point out the fact that there are major issues with it as well while defending their faith in the validity of scripture. For example, if those layers were formed over long periods of time, then why are there trees protruding through different sections into other sections? Or, why does carbon dating seem flawed after going back only a few thousand years? You can record the fur on an animal against the skin on the same animal and come up with a different set of numbers by thousands of years.


And when it comes to the Galapagos Islands and Darwin, Christians are so quick to band together regarding the difference between adaptation within a species and evolution itself. There is a difference for sure. So, here is a total side note that is separate from my upcoming question. The two men who popularized a philosophy that is considered a direct attack on the foundations of the church are both honored by being buried in the foundations of a church (just look up Westminster Abby).

So, here is the question I am asking in part…

If we as Christians are so quick to defend our faith and the Bible when it comes to the creation account of Adam, Eve, and the other variations of life… then why are we so quick to jump on the bandwagon of cosmological evolution by standing up for the very same set of philosophers of today who have their foundations in the works of people like Darwin and Arthur Holmes (the very people we are fighting against)?

Because, at the end of the day all of this stuff is piggybacking off of one another. You don’t get evolution without the Copernican Principle. You don’t get the Copernican Principle without the Big Bang. If you take away the Copernican Principle (which in my eyes is an absolute disordered account of the creation story in the Bible) you will have automatically removed the Big bang theory. If you remove the Big Bang, then evolution is obviously a lie.


I just don’t understand it.

We as Christians agree that evolution is not true. But on the other hand we are so quick to agree with the scientific community regarding their discoveries of distant galaxies, other habitable planets orbiting gas giants, and the ever expanding reaches of space.

How is it that we have missed this one?

Everything that modern astronomy is focused on today comes down to the Big Bang theory (which is at the end of the day, the foundation of the Copernican Principle… which feeds into the Geological Column… which feeds Darwin). When you hear of a planet being discovered, or that nebulas are were stars are born, or that the galaxy is slowly moving away from itself… all of those things are based on the Big Bang theory.

Why then, are we so quick to get excited and agree with man regarding creation when the foundations of mans interpretation of creation itself defies scripture?

My Bible doesn’t say that the stars are born in clouds of gas. My Bible says that the stars are the angels of heaven and that they have all already been numbered and named. My Bible doesn’t say that the sun is also a star. No, it says that the sun is separate from the stars. My bible doesn’t say that the sun was created first (which is how it would have to be under the Copernican Principle). No, my Bible says that the earth was made first. My bible doesn’t say that the earth is moving. No, it says that the sun is moving.

With all of that said, let me ask my question one last time.

Why are we as Christians so quick to defend the idea of Cosmological Evolution while in the same breath agreeing that the Big Bang is not how it happened?


But, who are we kidding… right?

I clearly am just ignorant and we really do exist in a world where it is okay to agree while simultaneously disagreeing. On one hand, we as Christians agree that the biblical account of Adam and Eve was real. But then, on the other hand… perhaps the creation of time, space, and matter itself was all just metaphorical. Because, you know… the wisdom of modern man supersedes scripture by placing scripture more and more into the realm of allegory rather than truth.

If the Christian world has already done enough homework to realize that Darwin, Holmes, and the Big bang are nothing more than the delusion of an Anti-Christ spirit, then why have we stopped there? As a Christian, if you actually stop and do the same type of homework regarding the cosmos, you will find the same line of reasoning that favors evolution coupled with a string of lies told by man.

I think it is time we stop trusting in the wisdom of man and actually dig into the scriptures to determine what the word says regarding the cosmos.  The thing that I find ironic is that some Christians actually use scripture to defend the Big bang.

Well, God said let there be light… and bang, it happened.

As cool as that sounds… it is the very thing that feeds the fact that we are still to this day fighting against the foundations of Darwin and Holmes.

You can’t have one without the other.

And if we agree that they forged lies regarding evolution, then as Christians why believe the very same set of people regarding the cosmos?

I just don’t get it.

Because, at the end of the day… when you actually stop and look at who is telling us what regarding the cosmos, you start to see things like this, or this.

With that in mind, why do we so quickly side with those in opposition of scripture?

Sending Man to the Moon one tourist attraction at a time

You know, it’s one thing to blow up a bunch of land in Arizona to so that it looks like the moon in an attempt to prepare for actually walking on the moon. But, it is another thing entirely to want to make sure that your mountains in the background are exactly the same. Because, you know… what better way to be prepared mentally than with as accurate as possible a visual backdrop as you can get. We wouldn’t want our Apollo 17 astronauts feeling uneasy on the moon because of a potential mountain variation in their peripheral while trying to do experiments on the moon.


With that, it makes sense that NASA chose Cinder Lake, Arizona when deciding to blow it up to make it look like the surface of the moon. Not only was there enough space there to lay out some awesome moon terrain, but it had a few familiar mountains in the distance as well. Perfect placement when you consider wanting to keep the astronauts at ease once actually on the real moon (it’s best to keep things familiar you know).

But, hey… don’t take my word for it. This is an actual place that you can go visit to this day in Cinder Lake, Arizona. And… if you look at it on Google Maps you can still see the moon craters that NASA put down. They aren’t as promontory as they used to be, what with age, weather, and time.


As a matter of fact, people go visit it all the time… including good ‘ol Buzz himself (seen in the cowboy hat). Man, those mountains looks familiar.


But… who are we kidding, right? NASA would never lie to us. The government would never do a thing like that… would they? Then again, like I said before. These mountains do seem oddly familiar.


But what do I know, right? I am ignorant.

So, here is the thing… God himself said that in the last days that he would allow strong delusion. Personally, I can’t think of anything stronger than fooling the entire world into a distorted view of creation that favors the Copernican Principle… which in turn validates the big bang… which in turn validates evolution… pushing God himself out of the picture.

2 Thessalonians 2:7-12Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders. And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

And for those of you that want to come back with  with something like…

how could the moon landing be fake if so many people around the world were involved in making it happen?”

Well, let’s just watch this short little video from Smarter Every Day, a youtuber that believes we did land on the moon. In this video we will learn several things which are listed below the video.

#1 Don Pettit is an idiot. He can’t pronouns the name of a man who has the same pronunciation as a module that Don works with every single day.

#2 By opening the windows of the Cupola you no longer maintain a pressure seal inside the ISS (you are loosing air).

#3 The seal is just a simple rubber ring (the exosphere is 3,000 degrees. The melting point of that seal is only 300 degrees and the host of the show knows that is absurd by his reaction).

#4 If a leak did occur, Don Pettit didn’t actually know the emergency procedure and you can tell that he was thrown off by these types of questions. The man spent more than 370 days in space with more than 13 spacewalks… and his answer is a stuttering “I don’t know“.

#5 It’s called real good engineering.

#6 the vacuum of space is being held back by two little pieces of rubber.

#7 We learn that the man who made the mechanism for the Cupola windows more than 20 years prior was left out of the loop. He never knew if they used his design (with that, how could they fake it if so many people were involved? It’s called a need to know basis). You do your part and you are left in the dark about everything else.

So… with that, if a distortion of creation itself resulting in the denial of a creator isn’t the strong delusion while still agreeing that we are in the end times… then by all means, please tell me… what type of a delusion could be any stronger than this?

Because, at the end of the day it is a lie. Space is fake.