And somehow people still think we can’t fake space!!!

yep.png

2002-blue-marble-anomalies.png

Whatever… if you want to be asleep, at this point you are doing it by choice. The great deception is at hand.

And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. Revelation 12:9

Please note that it doesn’t say he will deceive some, or just the unbelievers. No… it says all.

Anyway, I’m ignorant.

Talk to you later.

Subtle signs that hint to the truth

I have a lot of friends both Christian and non-Christian alike that love NASA. They love science and space exploration. They love learning about black holes, gas giants, and all the cool things NASA constantly puts out. I used to be like that too. But, the one thing that these two groups of people will disagree on is creation. The idea of God creating all things against the idea that it all started from nothing is a big debate. And today, many Christians side with the nothingness theory as if it were proven true, but still insist that God inspired the nothingness to create everything regardless of the fact that this concept goes against scripture.

And the pioneer of these epic discoveries just so happens to have no agenda at all. NASA is neither secular or Christian. Their agenda is clearly just one of science and the pursuit of knowledge… nothing more. Nothing less. That is one thing that both sides of the NASA fandom will agree on. NASA doesn’t have an agenda toward or against spiritual matters.

I am sorry, but I disagree with that entirely.

If they are known for being so none bias, then why is every single mission that they do related to pagan gods, Gnosticism, the occult, or outright luciferian concepts? And as of yesterday, we have yet again another example of this very thing to pile atop the countless other examples.

Meet Lucy, the mission that is apparently sending us to the Trojan Asteroids of Jupiter.

NASA-Lucy-spacecraft-studying-Jupiter-Trojan-asteroids-image-credit-Southwest-Research-Institute

Let’s totally set aside the fact that once again we are presented with nothing more than fake CGI junk rather than something tangible and real. Let’s stop and take a look the subliminal meanings behind this mission. And, in turn consider how NASA truly is none bias… or not.

The first thing to consider is the destination. We are sending a probe to a cluster of rocks known as Trojans. A Trojan by definition is a tool used to mislead large groups of people against the devices true intent. Secondly, we should stop and look at how and why the project was given its name; Lucy.

The name Lucy is derived from a Latin word, Lucius, meaning light. This explains why Satan is also known as Lucifer… also meaning light. And since the promises of Satan were transcendence and illumination, it is no wonder the movie Lucy was given such a name when evaluating what it was about (transcendence).

lucy_final_logosv

This patch symbolizes exactly the stance that NASA has on spiritual matters. With that in mind, I do not understand how so many Christians can so quickly rally behind this organization. Here, in this patch we have Lucy, the monkey skeleton… which stand on the bases of the evolution of mankind from primates to humans. Secondly, we have the rocks next to the probe. When compared to the ape bones to the probe we can see that it implies our evolutionary transcendence via the promises of Lucifer through knowledge and technology… who just so happens to hold the exact same meaning in his name as the word Lucy on the patch.

To make things even more interesting, the name of this NASA probe project was derived from the Beatles and a song called “Lucy in the sky with diamonds“. I could honestly rant on this fact forever. With that in mind I will simply point out that the album that this song appears on is heavily tied to LSD and Alice in Wonderland… which implies higher states of copiousness (Lucy being a great title since it means what it means).  Enough said.

So… why the diamond? Could it possibly be because it ties so well with the rest of the theme? I bet that could be the case. The diamond shape symbolizes ascension, clarity, and wisdom in many cultures.

With that said, here we have NASA propagating evolution to the masses, honoring Lucifer for his light of promising ascension, clarity, and wisdom through a band that is heavily associated with the occult. While at the same time admitting to your face that it is nothing more than a Trojan meant to mislead the masses, which is exactly what it is doing.

You want to keep believing in their fake CGI nonsense, you go right ahead.

As for myself, I will stick with the scriptures and the true scientific method. I don’t know. I guess I’m just ignorant, but a $19 billion dollar budget doesn’t automatically make your NASA cartoon truth. It is still just a cartoon.

And at the end of the day, I don’t care what you believe in… one thing is clear. NASA does promote a spiritual agenda weather you admit it or not. Just go back and look at the names of all their past missions.

There is a point when you could consider it all to be coincidence. But, let’s face it. We have been beyond that point for quite some time now.

the sun, apparently the final frontier

Well, apparently we are going to the sun. Seems legit to me. I honestly have to say, Don Pettit said it best: “If dinosaurs had explored space, they would still be alive today”. That too, also seems legit. I just don’t understand it. How in the ever loving truth does anyone actually believe any of this nonsensical CGI garbage?

All of the images and animations we are shown of the sun with its massive bursts of solar flares is absolute idiocy. The following is a much closer representation to the truth than what we are constantly shown. Do you see any flares of chaos or configurations of heating gas in either of these sets of images below? No… because this is what the sun actually looks like. Don’t get me wrong, the stuff we are presented looks way cooler and way more exciting (flares and masses of moving gas), but that does not make it truth!

NASA_s-SDO-Sees-a-Stretch-of-Spotless-Sun

But hey, if the entire world wants to think we are flying through space in 4 directions at once at unfathomable speeds while still managing to hold a motionless glass of water in their hands, then let them think whatever they want. The type of people that believe that type of nonsensical stuff are the same ones believing in NASA’s current claims of reaching out to the sun. Sure… next thing you know it we’ll be landing a man on the sun too. Or better yet, a man on Mars so we can get over there to figure out who the heck has been cleaning those solar panels on the Rovers for all these years.

Anyway, since most of you that read this blog know that I am totally against NASA and the concept the Copernican Principle in general, I thought I would share with you a few of the items on my Etsy Store that go right along with the theme of how I feel about today’s so called modern science. Because, you know… millions and billions of years is clearly observable, testable, and repeatable.

patches

In short, NASA is a liar, Michelson and Morley proved the earth was motionless already, and the ISS acronym actually stands for; international scam station. Science is something we can observe, test, and repeat. And almost all of what we are taught today about the world  around us defies observation, can’t be tested, and therefore can not be repeated.

Pseudoscience is a religion.

But no… seriously. I only have 3 questions. One, if the material hasn’t existed until now… what are we using said material for with practical application here on earth (none, because it doesn’t exist)? If a rocket leaves the atmosphere at let’s say, 800 miles an hour, how in the ever loving truth are they accelerating it to godlike speeds in the vacuum of space with nothing to push or pull against when trying to generate extra momentum? And finally, why are you buying into this nonsense? If we have a 4 inch shield that could withstand the radiation and heat that NASA claims, we could put a man in a suit made of that same material and go in and clean up Trinoble.

Just think about it. Use common sense and a basic understanding of physics and you will see right through this ridiculousness.

Then again, maybe I’m just ignorant.

How do the Astronauts fake 0G in the ISS

One thing that people continue to ask me is, if the ISS is fake, then how do they float around up there? You can’t fake Zero Gravity! Well, actually you can. Here are a few videos that explain how this is possible. First off, let’s start by sharing the idea that everything is magnetic, especially water. And guess what… we humans are nearly 80% water. Go figure.

Here is the Frog!!!

With that said, here is another, more logical look at how they fake Zero Gravity on the International Fake Station. It’s called the Vomit Commit, owned and operated by guess who… NASA. It is an airplane that simulates weightlessness.

Let’s not forget the green screens and wires.

But hey, who am I kidding… they really are up there spending 60 Million Dollars a day of our money. What do I know, right? I am just ignorant.

So, here is the last one. The top ten reasons not to believe any of this nonesense. ISS = international scam station. 

The Cavendish Experiment compromised by the pendulum effect?

I have a new question for the “scientists of today”. This question is in relationship to the Cavendish Experiment. For those of you that don’t know anything about this experiment, it’s a really big deal for physics and how we measure the known universe both in lengths and relative mass. How big is the earth? How massive is the moon? If the two objects are said to be such and such density, then they must be thus far apart for relative rotation to occur. And so on and so on. This experiment essentially weighed the earth giving us the gravitational constant. This constant is used to measure everything we know about the known universe. So, for me as a fan of space, this is the backbone of this field of science. For those of you that don’t know how the test works, here is a video of what the test was.

The thing that I find most odd about this test is the following. No one has actually successfully replicated this experiment, at least not that I have found. If you do a test and yielded a positive result, wouldn’t you want to test and retest the result to insure that you have it correct. Or better yet, change some variables to insure that the test isn’t being compromised by some outside force? Here is a video of s science professor expressing his admiration for the experiment despite having never gotten the experiment to work, himself. I find this odd.

Now, I have done enough digging that I have come across quite a few people who have attempted this experiment to varying degrees. And at that, with a few factors that in my opinion actually compromise the results. If you will note, the first two videos suggested two things. One, a closed system; so that no wind current would alter the results. And two; that the observer couldn’t be in the same room because their mass would alter the state of the experiment. And yet, if you look you will find countless attempts in open space with the observer present, no real control on the fixed points for observation, and air conditioning being factored into the process. All the tests you will find are relatively the same, and in my eyes inconclusive.

The idea behind the test is simple. The large mass of balls will gravitationally attract the smaller mass of balls toward themselves inward, twisting the pendulum or torsion rod toward the larger masses, thus giving us the gravitational constant when factoring the arch of the changes. When it comes to all of these tests, all I see is a free spinning shaft with two balls eventually touching against a resistance point. And because they touched the experiment essentially worked.

I’m sorry, but I don’t buy it. And here’s why. How many of you have heard of a foucault pendulum? For those of you who don’t know what that is, here it is.

So, here is my issue with how the most recent Cavendish Experiments have been done. Wouldn’t it stand to reason that a freestanding object on a cord hanging down from a fixed point would be compromised by the rotation of the earth? And if that is true, as the foucault pendulum clearly shows us, then wouldn’t the Cavendish Experiment be successful every time based on the pendulum effect alone? Eventually the rotational momentum would force the rods in a direction causing the smaller masses to find themselves resting against the larger objects?

With that in mind I propose an experiment (one of which I have yet to see done). The only way to determine for sure that the pendulum effect does not in any way neutralize the test results of the Cavendish Experiment we must do the test in three distinctly different ways. One, we set it up as shown by all the other endless attempts you will find online. The result will be the same as always. The smaller masses turn and connect with the larger ones. The second test would be to raise the smaller masses up directly above the larger masses by mere meters so that they don’t actually make contact. After doing this we set the masses 90 degrees from one another or at a 15 as shown in the first video and leave it alone. Over the course of 48 hours or more one of three things will have occurred. One, the smaller masses will do nothing. Two, they will find themselves fixed above the larger masses as the Experiment would suggest (attraction working as it should). Or three, the pendulum effect will make itself known and we will see the smaller masses rotate above the larger masses with no added resistance over a very long period of time. Then, let’s assume that the attraction does occur as we would expect/hope. If that is the case, the third and final test would be to start the test over and do it this time with the larger masses removed. If the smaller masses find themselves eventually resting in the same parallel point as the previous two tests eliminating the pendulum effect as a possiblye veritable, then wouldn’t it stand to reason that there are other variables we need to be considering that may be affecting the result (ie; Northern Pole. Large objects in or around the experiment that may alter its result)?

With this in mind, I find it hard to believe we found Big G from this experiment with no real re-verification of any kind taking place. Before we can truly say that this test works we need to 100 percent insure that the pendulum effect does not play a role in any way toward altering the results of this experiment. And so far, from what I have seen, no one has done this.

Why is that?

Please note I am not one of those people with some silly hidden agenda. I am just an honest guy seeking honest answers about science and how we understand the world around us.

So, why is it important to insure that we remove the pendulum affect from this experiment? Everything you know about the size, distance, and gravitational attraction of our known solar system is resting on the results of this one test (results I might add that were given to use in the 1800’s and have yet to be precisely duplicated since).

The heliocentric model and mph

So, I have a question. When I present this question, please note that I am not trying to stump or debunk any one thing. This is an honest and genuine question. But, before I pose said question I want to point out some variables that reference the reason why this question is even brought up. We known that the sun travels through space at roughly 483,000 miles per hour as it rotates around the Milky Way with the black hole as the center of its orbit. With that said, the earth travels around the sun in the same manor at roughly 67,000 miles per hour while at the same time spinning on an axis at roughly 1,000 miles per hour. When you think of space as a vacuum while adding all of these numbers together, the earth covers a brand new point within the void at roughly 551,000 mph. Obviously, these miles are not in a straight line and cover three different directions. But, in essence, the earth has three motions. Forward, around, and spin. The accumulated space that earth would transverse in a given hour across the vacuum would be 551,000 miles. To illustrate what I am talking about here is a short video of the heliocentric model in a vortex. Obviously, there are some flaws with the vortex theory, but it gives a clear visual framework for the three existing motions. Forward would be around the Milky Way. Rotation would be around the sun. And spin would be its daily axis.

So, in a nutshell, we are moving through space pretty freaking fast. Which leads me to something odd. The Polaris Star is the North Star. When you actually do a time laps with your camera it will show a perfect circle wrapping around that central point in the sky. Here is a video of what I am talking about.

Now, let’s assume that your time laps of this spiral is for only an 8 hour period. If this were the case, that would mean that the earth would have traveled across a total of 4,408,000 square miles of space in that period of time. Some of this traveled distance would be forward motion, spiral motion, and orbital motion.

With that in mind I have a series of questions that essentially boil down to one question. How is it that we can be moving in three different directions but still have a fixed position in space like the Polaris? One argument is that the Polaris Star is 400 light years away and is traveling with us at the same speed in the same direction. Okay, if that is the case, this only alleviates one of the three variables. With the forward motion removed because Polaris is moving forward with us that still leaves 544,000 miles that the earth would have rotated and spun within only 8 hours. How is it then that we can still have that fixed position if that much motion is taking place in two different directions? Two directions of motion would not create an exact circle.

Now, here is another thought along those same lines. We have recorded the same constellations in the sky for nearly 4,000 years. With forward motion, rotation, and spin, considered that is a total of 8,044,600,000 miles of space covered (assuming I am not doing the math wrong). And in that time, with that much distance, nothing has drastically changed in the night sky. Same constellations. Same North Star. Same central point in the night sky. If the Polaris star is lateral to us in parallel rotation with the Milky Way, what we see still does not add up.

So, here is the question. How has our night sky been in a fixed state for so long with this much motion taking place every hour, year, decade, and so on? And if the generic answer is distance in the perspective of light years, then I am still not buying it. Because at that point you still have to account for spin and rotation while only alleviating forward motion with that explanation.

Does someone have it figured out? Show me on paper how two curved motions (spin and rotation) would equal a straight line. What I am seeing in the night sky does not match what I have been taught.

No Satellites in orbit? Flat Earth? What is all of this?

Okay, so I have personally decided that for the most part NASA is a joke. Most of their photos are clearly edited and there has even been legitimate documentation of verbal proof telling that NASA does digitally generate its photos of the Earth from space. This is fact. But does that mean that every single detail of NASA is false? I don’t know. There are a lot of people that claim there is nothing true about NASA. No moon, no ISS, no satellites in space orbit. With that said, we don’t have a single photo of the earth from space. All of the images are digital composites. They are not real. So, here’s the thing. Since there is this mounting debate regarding the ISS and whether or not if it is in fact in orbit, I decided to do a little digging of my own and as a result only have one question I was hoping to have answered by someone, anyone. These flat earthers suggest that there are no manmade objects in orbit. So, on my own I type in satellite in orbit into google images.  Oddly enough, there are no actual photos of one of these objects in space. Instead all I get are these fake CGI photos.

satallitesfromspace

With that in mind, I kept digging. If there are something like 20k of these things in orbit, surely there is an actual photo taken by an amateur photographer/astronomer. If they are up there we would have photos, right? Well, after looking deeper I came across these images of the algid manmade objects in orbit. For many people this will be proof enough. Here are the real photos I was looking for after all, right? End of the story. But honestly, this isn’t good enough for me.

photosfromearthofsat

And here is why; You are telling me that an amateur astronomer can take a detailed photo with his telescope of planets like Jupiter, Mars, and Saturn from that great of a distance. And yet, that same telescope can’t capture a high resolution image of a satellite only about 300 to 400 miles away? There is something wrong with that logic.

Now, I am not saying that the flat earthers and the anti-NASA movement is right. All I am saying is this; if an amateur astronomer can take decent quality images of an object  576,682,810 miles away, why are these satellite images so poor when these objects are only about 400 miles away? Now, some people may suggest that the object is moving too fast and you can’t get a clear shot of it because it is in motion. I can agree with that, yes. But at the same time… with the video qualities we have developed for the amateurs of the world, surely there are some decent photos of the ISS from Earth taken by an average person like you and me that are without question real. I am posting this blog not to say that the ISS and the satellites are fake. I am posting this in hopes that someone will provide me photo evidence outside of just these crappy grainy questionable specs on a black surface.

And if you read this and have questions to… I ask that you do the same. Go get me that picture! I want to see it and put this thing to rest.