A conversation with a friend about NASA

The other day a very close friend and I were talking about re-entry for any manned mission entering the atmosphere. Anyone that reads my blog knows what my opinion is in regards to NASA. After having gone back and forth with my friend on the topic of the re-entry process of any object, manned or unmanned… I only have one question.

But, before I present my question, I want to point out that in the beginnings of NASA we are told that smashing into the atmosphere during re-entry can cause temperatures to rise above more than 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit (about 2,800 degrees Celsius). Not only does the exterior of the re-entry module reach above 5,000 degrees, but there are only a few inches of wall space between the exterior and interior of the cabin. Apparently NASA has developed a self consuming ablative heat shield that can withstand some pretty extreme temperatures (meaning that the heat experienced by the exterior of the object would not affect the temperature inside the object as it falls away from the craft).

But, don’t take my word for it… let’s ask NASA.

The initial conversation that I had with my friend was how I didn’t understand the mechanics of the heat shield they created and how it works so well. For example, in the above video the outside part is made of stainless steel. Stainless steel has a melting point of about 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit. Then, the honeycomb interior ablative heat shield in the video that is between the cabin and the stainless steel is nothing more than polymer fiberglass. Sadly enough, the melting point of this material also doesn’t even come close to being able to withstand 5,000 degrees (it has a melting point of about 2,200 degrees).

One other option that we are presented in the following video is pure silica-tiles (which again, sadly doesn’t have a melting point that reached 5,000 degrees). Although these tiles can withstand about 3,000 degrees, they were not used in the first video, but rather much later. Even still, that presents a problem.

The answer that finally clicked for me after having talked with my friend is the ceramic coating that was used. Apparently, NASA used a spray adhesive that was designed to melt away made of ceramic (which is pretty awesome considering the fact that it has a melting point of almost 6,900 degrees). If you spray enough of this stuff on and also consider the fact that re-entry time wasn’t anything more than a few minutes at most, this answer makes a lot of sense. However, the self consuming ablative heat shield in the first video was actually behind the stainless steel (notated throughout the entire first video with no mention of a ceramic outer layer). Again, the ablated material that was designed to dissipate upon re-entry in the first video was not on the outside of the stainless steel.  But, that is beside the point. Just for argument’s sake, let’s assume that the ceramic coating was applied in the first video. It very well could have been despite not being mentioned. Although I am still looking, the farthest back that I have been able to find this ceramic ablation in use by NASA only goes back as far as the early 1990’s.

This 1960’s document shows that re-entry exceeded the melting point of silica by more than 1,000 degrees. While this 1960’s document shows that the primary ablator  used during that time was 99.8% silica.

After having had this conversation with my friend and totally setting aside the conflicts that arise with re-entry (which was a lot of fun, because it made me evaluate and think, which is something I enjoy to do)… all it did was cause me to ask a new question.

Let’s assume that the stance my friend holds is the correct one.

With that, here is the question…

What happened to re-entry exceeding temperatures of 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit (about 2,800 degrees Celsius and above)?

yep.png

I guess they realized that such a temperature was a little too outlandish, so they dropped it down a bit. Who knows… it’s probably just me being ignorant. Good ol’ Nye or Tyson can probably solve it for us.

7ce

I am not claiming to have answers. I am presenting questions.

Hidden messages within modern commercials

Today’s post is another one regarding the degradation of our society away from the core values of morality.

While I was in the break room this morning I happened to catch this 30 second car commercial. For one, it shows how no one actually communicates anymore. Instead, people find themselves consumed by their devices (or better put; vices). The thing that I took away from this commercial however was the last thing the driver had to say.

He said, and I quote… “I have a brand new putter you don’t even know about. It’s awesome.” The way in which he said it, implying that it would remain a secret did not sit well with me at all.

Having pointed that out, I like how this commercial is so subtle with its none car insurance related message. First of all, we see the nice car, the beautiful healthy kids and pretty wife, as well as the insane amount of gadgets everyone in the car has. As a result it is very easy to assume that this is what success is supposed to look like.

Because, honestly… this family seems to have it together when you consider those aspects of the visuals we are presented (new car. Tons of expensive toys, etc.).

But, I digress.

Not only is this family disconnected as a result of being connected to their vices. It also implies through the driver’s final statement that there is a level of dishonesty, resentment, or even an intentional withholding of information within the family unit. Despite the fact that this family appears to have it together based on their material possessions, we can clearly see that the spiritual integrity of their relationships as a family is not founded in having open and honest dialogue.

I don’t know about you, but I would prefer honesty over luxury any day. Unfortunately, in this day and age we are constantly force fed this type of subtle propaganda to no end.

The sad truth is that this commercial is a success simply due to the fact that so many people within a family unit can relate to something as subtle as making a several hundred dollar purchase in secret while knowing that every financial decision can and does affect the entire family unit.

In short, if you are a covetous  person who prefers the pursuit of self interest over the values of honesty within your family unit, then this car insurance is for you.

But… who are we kidding. I am clearly ignorant, and I am just overthinking things. What’s the harm in shoving this down millions of people’s throats on constant repeat?

Probably nothing.

He’s going the distance. He’s going for… NASA

As of this month, NASA’s Curiosity Rover has apparently been on the surface of Mars for five years covering a distance of almost 10 miles on the alien terrain. With this new update from NASA and the announcement of five long years of success and counting for the Mars Rover, I decided to chime in.

Now, there is the obvious question; who took this photo seeing as to how Curiosity is the larger of the robots supposedly roaming Mars? The shot is taken from above, which rules out any of the other robots as an answer, let alone the fact that their locations are vastly spread apart.

shot.png

But that isn’t today’s post. No, today I wanted to ask a different question. But before I ask my question, let’s watch this one minute video that breaks down the basics of how the rover is actually driven by sending signals from earth and back.

So basically, in a nutshell we are to believe that NASA is sending a signal through earth’s atmosphere, across the vacuum of space, through Mars’ atmosphere, and back.

Okay, here we go…

Mars is literally supposed to be 33.9 million miles away. The closest is has ever gotten is 3.5 million miles away. Please tell me how you expect me to believe that you are sending a signal that far while also calculating the exact location the signal needs to hit in order to reach its destination when taking into account that you are spinning 1,000 miles an hour. Let alone the fact that Mars is traveling a speed that is supposed to be 66,500 miles an hour while also spinning at about 960 miles per hour as well. Couple that together with the fact that it can take anywhere between 4 to 24 minutes for the signal from earth to reach its destination. Let’s just say that by the time the signal from earth gets there, the rover and the planet are no longer in the same location.

Then there is the issue with the axis rotation of both planets. What happens when the signal being sent and the location of the receiver are on opposing sides as shown here?

sent.png

Now, before you get your panties in a twist and start spitting silly things at me like “they have satellites for that dumb-dumb“, take a look at this. In this NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory video link we have NASA claiming that they can send a signal through the freaking sun from earth to Mars and back. Sure, the file may lose some of its data, but we can always “photoshop” that back in later… which is why they take a vacation that week. This still doesn’t change the fact that they are claiming they could send data through the sun if they wanted to. Give me a freaking break people. Someone, please show me that awesomeness in real life. I want to see someone send a signal from one side of the earth to the other without going around it. No, instead… let’s do what NASA does. Send the signal through the planet. If they can do it with the sun, should be no problem, right?

If they can send a signal through the sun while still only losing parts of the data, then wouldn’t they be able to send a signal through the earth as well? Because, heck… seems to me that when the earth and Mars are in awkward positions like the illustration above, that’s all they’re doing.

That signal will just go right on through… don’t worry about it.

SONY DSC

Anyway, this rant has run its course. I am not claiming to know anything. All I am getting at here is this. Based on the information that NASA presents to us about what they are actually capable of with the aid of modern technology, we should be able to do a lot more as a civilian civilization. For example, if we can send a signal 33.9 million miles away while passing said signal information through the freaking sun, then why in the universe do I live in a world where I sometimes lose cell phone reception? Seems to me like the human race should already have that one solved.

But hey, who am I kidding. I’m ignorant and just don’t understand science and math. If I understood me some learnin‘, this stuff would add up. Heck, better yet… why not just do some research on your own? A great place to start would be Devon Island’s Roving the Arctic.

Space is fake.

Either that, or NASA needs to start up its own cell phone provider company to help fund projects. Seems like their coverage would be out of this world.

verizon-can-you-hear-me-now-guy

Space, the final frontier of discrepancies

I am no scientist, nor do I claim to have any bit a smarts in me wee-pea-brain. But, I can’t help but look at the following images and ask myself if NASA seems to have some continuity issues here. Observationally speaking, the images below don’t really match up.

space1.png

I just can’t help but notice the dissimilarities here. Look at how much closer those rings seem to have gotten while also becoming more in tune with how they would act if gravitational attraction on a cosmic scale were an actual factor. What I mean by that is this… the photo on the left seems to suggest that the rings are somehow offset from the sphere, and as a result somehow defy the way that gravity is supposed to act in the vacuum of space.

Come to think of it, I have looked at Saturn a few times in my life through a telescope. And not once have I ever observed its rings in a geometrical formation around the sphere such as the 2016 NASA photo seems to suggest. No, instead I have always observed it to be much like what we see in the image on the left (offset; defying the centrifugal momentum gravity would place on the rings). Why is it that this inconsistency exists? Why is it that what NASA shows us regarding this celestial body does not match what we can actually observe on our own when looking through a telescope? Apparently, the more expensive your telescope, the more it effects where the rings are positioned in relation to Saturn as a sphere.

Seems logical…

But it doesn’t stop there. If you go back and look at any of the images from 1960 and compare them to today’s NASA images, there are a lot of things that don’t seem to line up. Don’t get me wrong, I understand that the “quality” of a photo changes the way that the image will appear. I understand how focus works. I’ve used a camera. That will however… not change the shape or features of the image to the degree that we see here.

space2.png

Apparently, when you increase the resolution of an image the shape of that image and its features also change. I didn’t know that was how it worked. How ignorant of me. Speaking of shapes… the science people of today seem to suggest that the earth isn’t actually round at all. None of the planets are, apparently. Nope… they are oblate. And according to good ol’ Neil, the earth is pear shaped, because that makes sense.

If that is true, then why are all of the NASA images of any planet showing us something perfectly round? As you can see in the photo on the left of Jupiter, it doesn’t appear to be a perfect circle (which goes along with what scientists tell us about the shape of the earth and other heavenly bodies today). Why then are all of the photos of every planet including the earth perfectly spherical in shape today? They are either round or they aren’t. They can’t be both. Someone needs to get with Neil and Bill to clear all of that up.

Anyway, I feel like this rant has run its course. I just don’t feel that the drastic differences we see in the above images should exist over such a short amount of time. Something has got to give. Either the images from the 60’s were forged… or the images from today are forged. And since I can look through a telescope on my own and see roughly the same thing that was shown in the 60’s, I am inclined to agree with them. On the other hand, I can drop today’s NASA images into Photoshop and by changing the opacity to show where most NASA “photos” have been cropped, edited, or cloned in some way (making them no longer a photo, but a composite – which is a fancy way of saying, drawing). With that, I am more inclined to believe that the images provided to use today are the ones that are fake.

Having said that, here you go… rant actually over. Space is fake.

Someone explain these inconsistencies, please.

And if your attempt of an explanation is simply Googling one phrase, clicking the first video you find, and sending it to me… nice try, but no thanks. If you actually started looking closer at this stuff, you would be asking these types of questions, too.

But who are we kidding… right? I am ignorant.

Is the mark of the beast already here – 2017

Revelation 13:16-17 – And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

July 24th, 2017

April 8th, 2017

An ultra-trendy co-working space in central Stockholm is offering microchip implants to its 2,000 members, in order to help them open doors or operate office equipment. The implants have become so popular, the work space stages regular parties where attendees can get “chipped.

And before you point out that some of these people are getting it in their left hand rather than their right, please remember the bible says that he will force you to take the mark at some point. Right now, those that are taking this mark are doing it willingly. There is a difference.

June 15th, 2017

It’s not only starting to ramp up in the US this year, but overseas as well.

With all of this in mind, I would point out a post I did a few days ago regarding the removal of physical cash in 2018 with the aid of bitcoin.

This stuff has been on the cusp of taking of for nearly a decade now. News agencies like CNN and NBC have been telling us that this type of technology was headed our way for a while now. Well, it is finally here… right on top of us. There are a lot of other examples to look at. For starters there are a few large night clubs both in the states and abroad that use the rfid chip as a way to allow VIP members to skip the line at the door while also having rapid access to the bar. Some of these clubs also have what is called rfid implant parties.

Another example of how this thing has grown is what one spokesperson for an American based company had to say while chipping its employees this year. “When we came across this and saw it being used in other societies, we said why not us?

This means that it is already being used elsewhere to a large degree.

I am sorry, but I guess I am ignorant and I just don’t get it. Why would I be okay with going into a society where they have that much control over the populous? If they don’t like you for any one reason they can just turn off your chip (no more buying… no more selling).

This photo taken 10 May 2002 shows the VeriChip, w

Now, I am in no way suggesting that this rfid chip is without a doubt the mark of the beast. I have no personal way of knowing that for sure. No one does. All I am pointing out with this blog post is to what degree it has built up steam in the last 8 months worldwide.

With that in mind, I can’t help but wonder how many Americans have this implant already. With the drastic rise in articles like this one  popping up recently I wouldn’t be surprised if the average was currently something like 1 in 30.

But hey, what do I know? I’m just ignorant. Keep on keeping on and let big brother make your decisions for you. Because, before long regardless of whether its the rfid chip or not, there is coming a day when he will cause ALL to partake in just such a venture.

Final Point – please note that it says “to receive a mark in” and not “to receive a mark on“.

Revelation 13:16-17 – And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

 

Bitcoin – 2018 Predicted in 1988 and space rocks

I do not at all claim to know anything about bitcoin and I realize that a lot of people have probably already seen this Economist Magazine cover from 1988. So, with that… I realize that this is nothing new. That does not however change the fact that it is right around the corner. 2018 is only a few months away (2018 being on the bottom of the coin in the cover art).

bitcoin.png

With that in mind I am curious to see what happens with the current global currency system (debit/credit/paper). I find the cover art for the magazine to be rather interesting. The burning money and the phoenix. The fact this bird in particular represents death and rebirth and the evolution of a renewed dying system. The zero with the dash in the middle of it more than likely is based in numerology and mathematics, meaning empty set (out with the old and in with the new). I however find it rather odd that this same symbol in several languages is a representation for light.

Revelation 13:16-17And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

Now, obviously this bitcoin system will not be the mark (which I believe will be a physical mark). However, I do find it funny that the current bitcoin talk on the web is that it is seemingly fail-proof (you can’t just print more money and that they will set a cap on how much is in circulation). With that in mind, you better believe there will a false flag very shortly after switching from the old system over to this one… which will in turn give way to the excused needed to actually implement a physical mark. Here is a blog post I recently wrote that shows of a similar system already being implemented overseas.

This stuff is coming faster than most people realize. Does that mean that the end will happen in my lifetime? I don’t know… no ones does. What I can say however is this; it wouldn’t surprise me if it did.

With that in mind I find it hilarious that we have people like Stephen Hawking predicting the end of the world. It seems like every time he talks on this topic, the time gets shorter and shorter.

flying-stephen-hawking

“We are running out of space and the only places to go to are other worlds. It is time to explore other solar systems. Spreading out may be the only thing that saves us from ourselves. I am convinced that humans need to leave Earth,” – Stephen Hawking 

According to good ol’ Steve, we need to abandon earth of face extinction within the next few decades. Since he seems to think we need to leave, I have to ask… where does he expect us to go?

Because, Bill Nye seems to think there is nowhere to go! And honestly, I agree…

Anyway… I say all of that to say this one last thought to help kind of tie it all back together. The 2018 magazine reference and the upsurge in bitcoin isn’t going to solve anything. All it is going to do is usher in the excuse needed to implement a physical marking system for economical coherency in this rapidly changing world.

There is a reason why all of this is suddenly ramping up. Because time is running out.

So, the question is… what does global currency have to do with space exploration, Stephen Hawking predicting the end of days, and the signs of the times? Exactly that… time.

Timing is everything. And it is all unfolding simultaneously.

Revelation 6:16And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb.    

Sorry, Stephen… but trying to hide on another rock isn’t going to help.

NASA and the bible battle it out over the stars

Twinkle, twinkle little star. How I wonder what you are.

2

You know, I have spent most of my life just simply believing what I am told (as most people tend to do without realizing it). Over the course of the last two years I came to a few conclusions of my own regarding what we are told about the sun, moon, and stars. And sure enough, these days NASA is the major component that tends to tell us what we should think regarding the heavenly bodies above us. I could ramble for a little while on why I think NASA is a joke, but instead… you can just click here to view a few personal reasons why I have chosen to step away from what they tell us.

And with a need to look elsewhere for information about the objects in the sky, what better place to look than my KJV bible. But, before I take a glance at what the word has to say regarding these celestial bodies, let’s take a look at what good ol’ NASA says the stars are.

According to NASA the stars are nothing more than big balls of gas. Stars are born in the nebula of gas and dust. You can tell how hot a star is by what color it is. Red stars are not as hot as blue stars. Our sun is a yellow star. Although the sun, which is a star according to NASA… looks big to us, it is actually just a medium sized star (nothing great about it). It only looks big because the earth is so close to it.

Now, the funny thing to consider about what NASA tells us regarding these big balls of gas and dust known as nebula is the simple fact that it’s all nothing more than a bunch of cartoons. Everything that NASA presents is nothing more than artist illustrations. But, hey… don’t take my word for it. Let’s meet just one out of many of their countless space artists, Robert Hurt. He sure is proud of what he draws and how it so quickly becomes NASA fact (if you draw it, the Hubble telescope will find it). But hey, I didn’t say that. This one comes right out of the horses mouth.

Now, if you do enough NASA artist-illustrator digging you will find quite a few illustrators with the same story. They create their concepts out of “data” and fill in the blanks with their “imagination“. And then, shortly after that they are shocked to find that their imaginations have become the data. I find it so funny how that works.

Okay… so, if NASA’s concept of the sun, moon, and stars is simply speculative cartoon renderings garnished as factual data, is it possible that they have missed the mark and that perhaps there is another explanation for what we see when we look up toward the heavens? Considering the fact that everything NASA gives us is CGI, let’s go with a yes.

With that, what does the bible say?

SSS-Six-Days-5-stage

For starters, let’s just stick with the earth, sun, and moon. First off, we are told by NASA and their sister companies that the earth is moving in five directions at once and that relative to us the sun is the one not moving. Why is it then that there are more than 65 verses that tell us that it is the sun and moon that moves and not the earth?

I Chronicles 16:30 – “…the world also shall be stable, that it be not moved….”

Ecclesiastes 1:5 – “The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose.”

Or, what about that one time when God commanded the sun and moon to be still? It wasn’t the earth that stood still. It was the sun and moon. According to gravity and the mechanics of the Copernican Principle of Evolutionary Heliocentric Cosmology… had the earth stopped spinning, everything and everyone would have instantly died. But that’s not what happened.

Joshua 10:13 – “And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.”

Not to mention once again the fact that NASA says the sun isn’t great and is nothing more than a star. My bible says that it is one of the two “great” lights and that the stars were made also (meaning that the stars are separate).

1 Corinthians 15:41 – “There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars…”

Honestly, I have way more to say about the topic of modern cosmology vs the bible. But, I don’t want to overload you in one single post. We will consider this as a part one and I will post on it some more in the near future.

For now, we will conclude with this; NASA presents us with drawings that eventually become considered fact. Absolutely everything we are told is 100% opposite of what the bible says. Bible says great… NASA, not so great. Bible says it doesn’t move… NASA, it moves. Bible says stars are different that the sun… NASA, the sun is no different.

If we as Christians are going to take a stand against something like human evolution by believing that we are all descendant of Adam, then why are we so quick to side with a world of modern science based Gnostic teachers when what they teach is literally the exact opposite of what the bible says regarding creation… not to mention the fact that what they teach is the foundation for human evolution to begin with (something we already admit to be wrong)?

I don’t understand it.

Part one of NASA and the Bible battle it out over the stars rant finally over. I will pick up on this later.

But who are we kidding, right? I clearly am ignorant.